From the Appeal judgement:
Francis J heard evidence on behalf of the hospital... In addition, the judge received a substantial number of second opinions from leading authorities, in particular the following:-
Dr C, consultant in paediatric intensive care at St Mary’s Hospital, London
Dr D, consultant respiratory paediatrician at Southampton Hospital
Dr E, consultant and senior lecturer in paediatric neurology at the Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NHS Foundation Trust (described by the judge as a world expert in rare mitochondrial disorders)
Dr F, consultant paediatric neurologist at St Mary’s Hospital, London.
The parents each gave oral evidence and the judge also had evidence from a sister and a staff nurse working on the neo-natal intensive care unit at the hospital.
On the question of Charlie’s diagnosis and prognosis the experts, sadly, spoke with one voice.
So, any number of doctors (not just GOSH) are conspiring? Or maybe the doctors are right after all?