Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Children at weddings

234 replies

mintich · 05/07/2017 13:57

Not exactly AIBU, but what do you think of children/babies at weddings? Do you get offended if they aren't invited? Do you prefer to go to adult only weddings?

OP posts:
Decaffstilltastesweird · 06/07/2017 13:20

Agree re neighbours etc only being there for emergency child care or maybe a few hours in the evening. A whole day and / or overnight is a massive favour.

If it was for a sibling's wedding or the wedding of a couple we were both really good friends with, we would figure something out, but not for people we aren't especially close to. More often than not it's either DH's friend or mine, so one of us can stay at home with dc.

Decaffstilltastesweird · 06/07/2017 13:21

But YY - no offence taken here if dc not included on invite! At the age mine is now, I wouldn't bring her anyway. Too stressful.

RiversrunWoodville · 06/07/2017 13:28

Fluffy if more weddings were like yours I would like weddings a lot! Grin

user1485342611 · 06/07/2017 13:29

I don't have strong views on the matter. Entirely up to the B&G what they want/can afford in relation to children at weddings. Also, of course, the number of your friends and relatives who have children would be an important deciding factor.

What I really, really dislike though is people describing child free weddings as 'boring', or the bride and groom as 'dicks' or implying that anyone who doesn't invite children to their wedding hasn't got strong family values.

Incredibly judgmental.

Want2bSupermum · 06/07/2017 13:32

We invited all, kids included to our wedding. My brother and SIL had a child free wedding. Convenient for her family as no children. I was told by my SILs mother that my children were unruly and would ruin the ceremony. DS is autistic. To say I was offended is an understatement and no we did not attend the wedding. Luckily I was 38 weeks pregnant and had our baby girl on the following Monday morning 3000 miles away.

1bighappyfamily · 06/07/2017 13:34

Yes, I get that age, stage and number does have something to do with it. I'm shortly to have a friend's two children to stay while they're at a wedding, but I know them very well, and they get on really well with my children to whom they are very close in age. If you changed that dynamic it would be harder.

Neither of mine are good at late nights, I suppose that's the other thing. The very idea of DD1 up past 9pm makes my blood run cold - far better off for her, and everyone else involved, if they weren't at a wedding.

All families are different and that's what it come back to really!

TheProdigalRhubarb · 06/07/2017 13:39

had a full program of semi compulsory, gender segregated "fun" activities around it

I went to one of these. God it was horrific. You did well to avoid.

MagicMoneyTree · 06/07/2017 13:54

Sometimes your options for babysitting are invited to the wedding! We're going to one this year where DS is invited. We'd have left him with family if we could but they're all attending too- and any other options are too far away and not possible logistically. There are loads of other reasons that people may not have childcare though- cannot afford to pay for it whenever there's a wedding. Kids won't settle for other people. Babies too young to be left all day (but too old to be classed as babes in arms). Wedding is mid-week and involves overnight stay. Not all parents would have someone available to leave their kids with and get them up and ready and do the school run for them.

MagicMoneyTree · 06/07/2017 13:55

Sorry if not clear, that was to 1bighappyfamily

MagicMoneyTree · 06/07/2017 14:02

Oh and whenever I have declined a wedding invitation I have never given a reason. Just send a card declining. Harder to do that when it's close family of course but thankfully that has never been a problem as all our family weddings have included kids. I wouldn't decline to a friend with anything about not having childcare. Just sorry I can't make it, hope you have a lovely day, etc.

Orangebird69 · 06/07/2017 14:02

I had children as guests at both my weddings ... I've nothing against it at all but if I got an invite to child free wedding, I'd be buying a dress that I didn't have to consider breastfeeding in, dropping off ds at dms house tout suite and booking lunch for the next day to eat my way out of the hangover I'd inevitably have when picking ds up on the way home.

1bighappyfamily · 06/07/2017 14:30

MagicMoneyTree absolutely agree and that's why I said in my second post that age and stage have a lot to do with it all.

I suppose I see lots of threads on MN where people say "I would never go to a wedding without my children as I couldn't get childcare." and I find that odd as a blanket statement. it also often comes from people who find it odd that children aren't invited. My MIL once told me that she would never have gone anywhere where her children weren't invited. I found that odd. Growing up I knew there were events where we weren't invited and I was fine with that.

Cutesbabasmummy · 06/07/2017 14:35

Our wedding was childfree. If we'd invited them we would have had three tables of kids and not enough room to have everyone else we wanted there.

faithinthesound · 06/07/2017 18:05

This thread got me feeling some kinda way.

"I think children make a wedding" "Children make a wedding"

If you were talking about a daycare center or a nursery, you'd be right: you cannot have a daycare center or a nursery without children. But we are talking about a wedding. Children do not make a wedding. Children, IF invited, make guests. The couple being married is what makes the wedding.

And I LIKE kids! Let's not get it twisted. But I have been to weddings where the children were horribly behaved (to the point where they were literally having a punch up in the middle of the outdoor area where we were all seated, and their parents were studiously ignoring them). I have been to weddings where the toddlers threw tantrums and everyone shrugged their shoulders and said "that's what toddlers do". I have been to weddings where the babes in arms cried through the vows and everyone shrugged their shoulders and said "that's what babies do".

Okay. But I don't WANT there to be any punch ups, any horribly behaved children and feckless wastrel parents ignoring them at my wedding. I know toddlers throw tantrums, but I don't WANT there to be any tantrums thrown at my wedding. I know babies cry, I don't WANT my vows interrupted by crying babies.

If and when I get married there will be no children at my wedding, no elementary aged children, no preschoolers, no toddlers, and no babes in arms. As a "bride" I would be asking for ONE special day that was about me marrying the person I love. ONE. I do not think it is too much to ask that I get one day. And if people who are invited to my wedding cannot make other arrangements, that is sad, but ultimately their choice. My choice is not to have anyone under the age of fourteen at my wedding. And I am the "bride", so on this one day, my choice trumps anyone else's.

And here's something else. Even if you do take your baby out (and be f*cking honest, you won't), the damage is already done, the wonderful special moment where my partner and I are pledging ourselves to each other for the rest of our lives has been broken, the attention firmly placed on your baby.

But it's not your baby's day, is it? It's MY day, and my partner's. Our ONE day. I'm not going to come to your baby's birthday and insist that everyone look at me, look at me, look at me, because that would be your baby's day, and that would be selfish and unreasonable of me. I don't understand why you get to make my day all about your baby or child, and somehow I am still the selfish one. Get your life! People are TRYING it, but not on me, not on my day.

I'll say this, too. No wedding I have ever been to has given me less than five or six month's notice. You have time to find childcare in all but the most extreme cases (you're pregnant now and your baby will be a newborn; your child has special needs that can't be easily seen to, etc). This "I can't afford a babysitter" is crap - with five to six month's notice you could put aside five dollars a week, and just about cover it. It's about priorities, and while I know that your child will take precedence over me (and so they should), if I mean enough to you that you're considering sharing my special day with me, that should not be too much to ask.

So. In short. At my wedding, there will be no children under the age of fourteen. No correspondence will be entered into, and there will be a bouncer at the door for those people who inevitably think the rules do not apply to them. Call me selfish if you want, but I think on my wedding day I get to be selfish. I'm not the one making someone else's special day all about me.

MagicMoneyTree · 06/07/2017 18:17

Absolutely fine, totally up to you. BUT... for some mothers of young babies, there just isn't any choice- if they cannot take their baby, they cannot attend. NOT a choice. Just a fact.

faithinthesound · 06/07/2017 18:19

And like I said, if that's the case, then it's sad you won't be there, but I'm not prepared to concede the baby. Not that day. That ONE day.

MargaretCavendish · 06/07/2017 18:20

I think what a lot of people on this thread seem to not understand is that people know that some parents won't attend a childfree wedding. It's just that your presence isn't the huge loss to the couple you think it will be.

faithinthesound · 06/07/2017 18:22

And actually, hilariously? Any other day there's a good chance I'll be down on my hands and knees playing with your baby and ignoring you, lol!!! I do really like kids. But I feel some type of way about my wedding day. It's the one day in my life where I want everything to be about ME (and the person I am marrying).

ComeTheFuck0nBridget · 06/07/2017 18:23

I used to be a wedding photographer and always found the weddings with children to be much... I don't know, nicer? It was lovely to see them, they break the ice (first up dancing etc), and I've never known them to cause bother, often just running around the grounds with each other. I prefer kids at weddings when I'm a guest too.

smallchanceofrain · 06/07/2017 18:37

I think it depends what the couple want and inviting children is great if the couple understand that young children will struggle to sit quietly and look decorative for long periods of time.
My cousin was wonderfully inclusive and invited all the children of family and friends. I know she regretted it. Partly because the reception was utter chaos; but mainly because my then 2 year old, having spotted a picture of a dove in the church, started shouting "big fat pigeon" as she was taking her vows. This was followed by very loud wailing as I carried him out of the church. She paid a fortune for a really good quality wedding video. Oops! Blush Grin

BeyondThePage · 06/07/2017 18:37

faithinthesound I don't know what to say... that post sounds awful to me - me, my, I - you mentioned the word "our" - once.

Our wedding day was not "all about me" - it was about my husband and I joining together legally in the presence of our families and celebrating our marriage and future life together. (yes we had kids there - from babes in arms to sullen teens)

I can understand some don't want children involved, but that post was definitely verging on the bridezilla!

McTufty · 06/07/2017 18:39

I think there's middle ground between child free as in literally no one under 18, and limited children e.g. Family children or wedding party only. In the latter case a small number of children that are close to the bride and groom are usually a welcome addition in my opinion (though I get why others disagree).

A lot of people seem to be complaining if when invited to a friend's wedding their kids aren't invited as though all children of guests should be. That is a very different thing.

faith totally agree it's unacceptable for someone to think that because they've had a baby their wishes for someone else's wedding are more important than the bride and groom's.

WhatToDoAboutThis2017 · 06/07/2017 18:40

I hate childrenat weddings.

We had a child-free wedding and I'm so, so glad we did.

museumum · 06/07/2017 18:44

Family weddings I prefer to take ds as the extended family don't get together often and it's nice for them and him to see each other.
Friends weddings I'd prefer to leave him home.

faithinthesound · 06/07/2017 18:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread