Not only that, he proposed punishing the very people that provide most of the pocket money, thus risking them taking their money elsewhere - but the sweeties would still need to have been paid for
Has been pointed out repeatedly Labour not suggesting sky high income or corporate tax. Companies and high income earners were very unlikely to leave in droves. Also a country's global competitiveness not only judged on corporate tax levels.
the demonisation of 'the rich not seen Corbyn and colleagues once demonise the rich during the campaign. They merely honestly said asking them with a bit more to pay a bit more. And it is a bit more someone on £90,000 under a Corbyn would have to pay £500 more in tax annually. The poor and disabled have suffered the biggest financial loss proportionally these last seven years. In my eyes the poor and those in IDS words 'languishing on sickness benefits' have frequently been demonised in the press and by remarks from some Tory MP's these past seven years to justify cuts. Know you are are on ESA yet still support Tory so mustn't view it like that but not how I and many others I know have experienced it.
Universal everything, including school dinners, nursery places, musical instruments, university fees, maintenance grants, triple lock (rather than double) on pensions, renationalisation of everything etc etc
The use of the word freebies makes it sound like they are offering free holidays to Vegas, not things that contribute to a economically and socially high functioning society. Even school dinners may save costs in the long run with less healthcare costs.
However, Corbyn's alternative economic model that offers a credible economic alternative with a good chance of working and fairness built into its fabric is not going to be tried as May has hung on. So we continue with more austerity and low economic growth.