It's really interesting to me that the people on this thread (including the OP) who are so strongly pro secrets are basically ignoring any substantive arguments against them and just keep repeating over and over how incompetent and emotionally weak they think us posters are who disagree.
It's probably really telling because it's come up over and over. Calling us pathetic, sad, weak, silly, "emotionally incontinent".
Posters have brought up:
- burden of keeping secrets for the secret keeper
- general expectation of sharing in friendship group
- concern over a culture of secrets
- mode of processing requires discussion
- disagreement that disclosing can't be done compassionately
No one seems interested in addressing any of those posts. Instead, it's generally ignored in favour of basically insisting that anyone who needs a confidant is weak. And that's exactly why I don't keep secrets. Because people who believe keeping secrets and never needing anyone have the exact opposite of emotional strength to me.
Living a guarded closed life is not emotional strength, it's weakness. It's because people know that they care a lot what other people think, they know they can be hurt and they don't feel they can cope. They're afraid. Like people who brag really loudly to mask their insecurity. And people who are aggressive instead of assertive. It masks a lot of pain and poor coping skills. So they have control freakish tendencies. And they do a lot of projection which is why so many people on this thread are so desperate to explain to everyone else how weak and pathetic we are.
Well, only one side is secure enough in ourselves, our lives, our choices and our friendships to be able to trust our friends, that they will confide in whomever they need in order to be give us the support we need. And it's not the "secret keepers".
Happy "teller" over here!