There's a lot to think about in terms of reactions to the level of language used in the tweets etc. I think lingle is right there. I've found the reaction to the mis spelled 'terrorist' list and some of the responses on the last thread to a video speculating about Trumps reading level both interesting and kind of off putting.
I'm dyslexic, my 'raw' spelling is still pretty rubbish and my proof reading isn't fantastic but I'm very aware of this and as a result take ages checking and re-checking any important emails or documents I have to send out (and often get someone else to check them too).
So while I find it surprising that semi-official documents are being released in a state where everyone comments on the poor spelling (because my paranoia wouldn't let me put myself in that position) I find it off putting that a large proportion of the reaction then concentrates on how thick the authors must be to not know how to spell Denmark rather than focusing on factual errors or omissions.
It's sort of similar to when a thread gets derailed by someone focusing on one tiny side detail in one post and refusing to discuss anything else but with a side order of superiority that puts anyone who could see themselves making the same mistake automatically on the defensive