Oh look at me putting all my children in gender neutral clothes,not all that stupid girly stuff.
Bertrand is correct - gender neutral means boys ' clothes.
I think Lumela and her daughters are completely missing the point.
No, Lass, I think you're completely missing my point. Possibly I was too concise, but I did say 'a lot of' not 'entirely' boys' clothes. There is a spectrum of children's clothes, from the stuff with tanks and helicopters on it to the pink frills. I tried to select my DDs' clothes from the middle of that spectrum: I wanted clothes that were practical, didn't show the dirt and gave the children a choice: I didn't want my daughters shoved down the 'to be female is to be frilly and ornamental' route. My DC were muck magnets, and generally the boys' version was usually in a darker colour.
I can see what you're driving at re Grayson Perry and Boy George and anyone wearing what they like. But en route to that (if we ever get there), as a culture we'll probably go through some sort of a halfway house, where there are a lot more children's clothes available that would do (in the current mindset) for either sex, with (say) babygros with leaves and hedgehogs on them which would have anyone peering into the pram having no clue of the sex of the baby within. That, I think, is what DD was talking about. After all, if 'gender neutral' in her terms meant 'boys' clothes', all she has to do is trot into the local shops.