Right, but for those having babies RIGHT NOW, what are they supposed to do until this alternative solution is put in place??
Honestly? I can see both sides of this. I think the most reasonable stopgap is the wards for those who want partners, and wards for those who definitely don't want men staying overnight under any circumstances, with the appreciation that there may be circumstances where provision and need don't directly match, and not everyone may get what they want/need, meaning midwives will have to make decisions about who goes where based on need, including both physical and psychological need.
With DS1 (who was signicantly more unwell post birth than hale and hearty DS2, and I was correspondingly more stressed and exhausted, though without the physical limitations and impacts of a C-section birth) I would have loved DH to stay, but it was against Trust policy at the time.
With DS2, he was allowed to stay but we decided it made more sense for him to go home (in the wee hours after we were transferred to the ward after many hours or stitching up - it was quite the jigsaw puzzle), because he needed to collect DS1 from our friends first thing in the morning.
The key to both was responsive staff. I know I'm lucky to have given birth in a good hospital, or maybe it's a shit hospital and was lucky both times. But my experience should not be the exception.