My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

MNHQ have commented on this thread

AIBU?

To think the Ched Evans verdict shows why mob justice is wrong

864 replies

JonathanDunn · 14/10/2016 17:10

Hundreds of thousands of people were willing Condemn a innocent man. He was practically forced out of football. This is why we can't play jury from our sofas.

OP posts:
Report
Totallymyownperson · 31/10/2016 14:51

I wonder if boycotting ce future father in laws business would send a message about what a lot of people feel about 2nd verdict but I suppose the rich and famous customers don't care about any of this

Report
Pyramus · 21/12/2016 16:43

The CCTV footage shows quite clearly that when she entered the hotel lobby she was walking perfectly normally despite wearing high heels. Previous CCTV footage of that night, from a kebab shop, showed that she fell over. A woman in high heels falls over, and people assume that she was too drunk to consent or stand up. The later CCTV footage contradicts that. A man has spent 2 and a half years in prison for something he didn't do. Jolly sporting isn't it?

Report
Dawndonnaagain · 21/12/2016 16:58

Why the fuck would you create a new account/name change to revive a thread that's four months old?
Reported.

Report
MrsPeelyWally · 21/12/2016 17:00

He's a filthy bastard.

Report
thatdearoctopus · 21/12/2016 17:45

This is a zombie thread, and idiot observations like yours just go to show how little you know of the endless threads debating this case.

Report
MrsPeelyWally · 21/12/2016 17:49

This is a zombie thread, and idiot observations like yours just go to show how little you know of the endless threads debating this case

Thank you for your contribution.

Report
Totallymyownperson · 21/12/2016 18:07

What's Pyramus going on about the images of woman entering hotel show her wearing brown boots not heels. In that footage she was being held by CM. in the kebab shop she was not holding onto anyone and falling. This thread started on 14.10.16 it's not 4 months old

Report
RufusTheSpartacusReindeer · 21/12/2016 18:18

What mrs ?

that was referring to pyramus wasnt she?

Report
thatdearoctopus · 21/12/2016 18:31

Yes, I was. I suggest pyramus goes back to RTFT.

Report
Totallymyownperson · 21/12/2016 18:35

Yes I was i cant understand y people his version makes any sense. The people that were there that night I.e receptionist didn't hear female voice and yet CE said she was doing the talking. This was independent witnesses with nothing to gain or lose. Even CM contradicted CE version of events at 1st trial 2nd trial jury never heard that

Report
BoneyBackJefferson · 21/12/2016 18:43

Pyramus

thank you for ignoring all of the other evidence. Whatever makes you feel better.

Lets not forget that even though he is legally not guilty,
At best
He turned a taxi around on the say so of his mate
he lied to get in to the room
He left by the fire exit
His mate said that the woman was not well
and he deliberately cheated on his girlfriend, whilst his mates tried to film it.

So he is still a lying, cheating scumbag, that I wouldn't want anywhere near my children.

Report
Totallymyownperson · 21/12/2016 18:52

Wonder what happened to the film his half brother took no mention of what happened to it in the papers

Report
Dawndonnaagain · 21/12/2016 19:07

This thread started on 14.10.16 it's not 4 months old
Three months old. It's still a zombie thread!

Report
Totallymyownperson · 21/12/2016 19:17

It's becomes zombie thread when the last post is 90 days old

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.