Don't understand why people are saying things like 'it's up to you to educate your children, not Disney'.

I would love Disney to feature a same sex couple (I would love it 100x over if they gave Elsa a girlfriend, but I do accept that's no t going to happen!). Not because I haven't managed to teach my own child about different types of relationship - with a lesbian mother and many many family friends in same sex couples, that would be frankly rather hard to avoid - but because I would like that for him
in addition to his lived reality, the infrequent conversations we have about these things, and the carefully cherry-picked books which help normalise it. And because of what a pp said about it fitting in as part of a general 'more agency for female characters' thing. And for all the children in other families who
don't grow up with actual real-life LGB people in their lives, who haven't already had
And Tango Makes Three forces down their throats, but who may well grow up to be gay themselves or, you know, meet a gay person and need to not be a confused and awkward bigot.
Seriously, either romances - which is what most of the Disney princess films are - are appropriate for your child, or they're not. I can't understand the argument that it's ok to expose a child to girl+boy but not girl+girl. What exactly is the difference? The princess and her suitor Elsa and Megara would dance, kiss chastely on strictly one occasion, and get married. Where's the hyper sexualised gay in all this?