It's fine to go off him a bit. It's fine to idly ponder the motives of high profile charitable acts. Your personal reaction to something is just that and you've been honest. Intellectually, I think you know it's not what you'd have liked as a reaction.
The problem with your thread and the reason for the reactions you've caused, is your comments about well lots of people lose a parent at 6 and why can't he just write a cheque. It's at that point your personal reaction to something in the public eye becomes a judgement on his right to his own honest and personal reactions to HIS grief and his life situation.
It's mild I grant you but in the aftermath of his gargantuan effort, you aren't just pondering motive, you're implying he should have done differently according to your sensibilities. It's that which people are reacting to.
He's a fabulous man and of course no act is purely altruistic. The ego and personality of an individual who does stand up comedy on an international stage isn't one of shy retirement. Not his public persona at least. I actually think he's very honest about his drive to do comedy or big events. And I think it's only a fraction of who he is. Behind that, I think he's quietly many other admirable things too.
Perhaps the problem also lies with the way we're encouraged to shy away from admiring huge personal success or feats or to deride those in the public eye in insipid and unkind ways.
Anyway, I can't agree bibbity. I sort of understand but I think you've misjudged.