How many doctors do you actually know?
Lots!
I know several who will privately admit that the current vaccination regime has tilted far too far in the wrong direction, risk-benefit wise, but they say they would never say it in public as their career would be destroyed.
Seriously, I cannot imagine an NHS doctor saying this (unless their concerns were about cost). It just wouldn't even cross their minds. Nor would they be worried about their careers (the NHS isn't MI5). Which vaccinations have "tilted too far in the wrong direction"? Polio/Hib/pneumococcal/pertussis? Rotavirus? Men C and B? Tetanus? Which one of those would you imagine we should chuck out? The NHS is pretty conservative about the vaccine schedule, and I can't think of a single one which hasn't had a weight of data about population benefits to support it. There are plenty of vaccines available to older people, too, but somehow there doesn't seem to be much argument about whether, eg., elderly people should just suffer shingles, because the vaccination is too risky for them....or, perhaps let's not develop those Ebola vaccinations any further in case the poor people in Liberia overload their immune systems.
The truth is that yes, there are loads of nasties in vaccines (and in every other medicine we use) and we have no idea what effect they could have in the long run as quite simply, we have not done enough long range studies, but that we as a society have decided that probably on balance the benefit of reducing he burden from certain diseases is worth the unknown risk from those nasties.
There are plenty of long-range studies on vaccinated populations. Early forms of vaccination were imported to Europe from Turkey in the eighteenth century. It isn't like they were suddenly invented by Big Pharma in the last 30 years.
The lobbying from vaccine companies probably does have something to do with which diseases we decide that is the case for, and as such it varies from country to country.
The decision on which diseases to vaccinate against is done on medical evidence and forecasting of risks and benefits, as well as cost, public health messages and benefits, and practicalities, in the NHS. The idea that it's about lobbying from vaccine companies is laughable. Some countries, like the US, which has very reduced annual leave compared to the UK, count parents' time off looking after children with chickenpox as economically worth the while of vaccinating; whereas the NHS doesn't (amongst other reasons, including the history of the MMR scare; in fact the primary reason why we don't vaccinate against varicella is the fear that it will further dilute MMR uptake, not anything to do with vaccine companies).