Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Or is the vicar? Noisy DCs in church

861 replies

drspouse · 14/02/2016 13:32

Background so as not to drip feed, bear with me as this is horrendously long: we go to a fairly naice church in a large historic building, locally there is a sought after church secondary school but none of the church primary schools are over subscribed. We've been going to this church for 12 years and we have two DC, aged 4 and 1. The 4yo is being investigated for mild SN and has always, always been very "lively". DC2 is walking.

The church knows us. Current vicar has been there about as long as our DC1 and baptised both of them. Church has a side chapel which is open to the rest of the pews where there are baby/toddler toys, a mat to play on. One other family (who are new to the country and have a 10 month old) use this baby play area every week.

The 4yo goes to Sunday School in term time, one of us goes with him, as we take it in turns and it doesn't last the whole service, both of us get some time during the service actually in the church. He's just starting to be able to stay in for 10 minutes on his own. DC2 is still lively and, yes, noisy in the side chapel. The other regular family's baby isn't walking yet. When smaller, both he and our DC2 could be quietened by feeding or carrying around.

Because of the pressure for secondary admission, most of the families that come have primary aged children. I can think of a couple of other families who are regulars with young DCs e.g. one Sunday School teacher has an 18 month old but I think she is restrained sat with them on non-Sunday School weeks not in the side chapel.

Today was the first weekend of half term, no Sunday school, there were 2 other children at church apart from our "baby chapel" group, maybe 6 and 8, who were using a construction toy in the side chapel for part of the time. Our DC1 was running around, fairly quietly, but was also throwing a small, soft, non-dangerous teddy up and down and catching it or running to get it. Frankly the only way to stop this would have been to physically restrain DC1 leading to shouting, screaming and kicking. This could be seen from the main church. DC2 was very excited by this and was squeaking, and also as a new walker fell over 2 or 3 times and cried, and was cuddled, and then was quiet.

Half way through someone came in and said "did we know the other room was open, we could go there if we wished". We declined and said no, we wouldn't, because where would be the point in being at church if we were not in the church? we might as well stay home. This is the first time in four years anyone has said anything, and I was massively surprised. It's definitely not the first time we were noisy!

The vicar stopped me on the way out and repeated that something had to be done, that it was distracting, people had complained, and that it was "exciting the other children" (the ones quietly using a construction toy? or the 10 month old who was quiet?) I said that the answer was not for us to go out because there was no point in us going to church if we couldn't be IN church. He repeated that "something must be done".

How does your church run this? Can you give us any ideas for suggestions? We want to bring this up and make some constructive suggestions (though frankly if the church can't put up with noise, it can't put up with children, and it will be left with definitely nobody under 5 and probably nobody under 50).

The historic fabric means a glassed off area is not possible (and I'd feel massively excluded in an aquarium every week!). There's only one area out of the church where smaller children could play (so they couldn't run a creche at the same time as Sunday School). We'd also feel pretty excluded if we couldn't go on non-Sunday School weeks (which is probably 15-20 weeks of the year), and I wouldn't bother if we had to be in an area with "piped church", also. It's not a "praise band" church where listening through an audio or video link gets you the flavour of church, it's a trad but (we thought) friendly church with old fashioned liturgy.

OP posts:
honkinghaddock · 17/02/2016 15:49

If it suspected someone has sn, they should be treated as though they have sn. That is the considerate thing to do.

GruntledOne · 17/02/2016 15:51

Cityfox, please don't tell me you seriously believe that the vicar and congregation are all waiting for an official diagnosis before they will condescend to accommodate OP's child? How would that fit in with the christian ethos?

CityFox · 17/02/2016 15:53

I think it's very inconsiderate, and the fuck em' attitude could apply either way.

Has the OP spoken to the vicar about her child possibly having SN?

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 15:55

your attitude is disturbing, cityfox

CityFox · 17/02/2016 15:55

So is yours fanjo.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 15:57

inclusion is disturbing to you? oh well, whatever

AdriftOnMemoryBliss · 17/02/2016 15:57

Unfortunately Mad, DS has significant sensory processing issues and the noise/reverberation, smell...etc in church is just beyond him. he finds it too overwhelming.

As much as people try to say the church should be accomodating, i don't think making him sit there or inflicting the vocal stimming, physically ticking or constant flow of chatter an environment like the provokes him into, or a potential meltdown if i try to limit those behaviours, onto other people is fair.

i appreciate other SEN mums might not agree with that sentiment, but i dont agree with taking DS places he finds uncomfortable just because i want to go!

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 15:57

not surprised.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 15:58

adrift, thats fair enough not to take him places he finds uncomfortable.

The world is messed up if you feel you can't take him places he enjoys because it is "inflicting him" on other people though. Thats very sad.

CityFox · 17/02/2016 15:59

Has she even spoken to the vicar about her child possibly having special needs?

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:05

I always do my best to manage DD's behaviour - despite the people who are opposed to inclusion and argue with me always insisting that I believe in and argue for inclusion because i just want to let DD run free. I bet i work harder with her than most people on here with their kids.

But sometimes people CAN'T learn to sit quietly even with the greatest attempts to enforce boundaries, or with the parents making an effort (yes letting a child play quietly can often be the "best" a child can behave, and they should not be packed off into another room for failing to achieve behavioural standards due to a disability.

My DD doesn't give a stuff about sitting quietly and no amount of firm boundaries would teach her that this is a socially good thing to do. The fact she can't learn it (although she actually sits well) should not mean she is excluded or that I am blamed for not being good enough at training her.

People should not accuse parents of slack parenting, if they don't manage to achieve this Utopian ideal of sitting silently, and instead reach a compromise. Sometimes the solution is different for children with SN, like throwing a teddy in air instead of screeching.

in an ideal world you would take your DS anywhere you could take an NT child, Adrift, and not feel bad for doing so because he might disturb others.

As this thread shows however, if even churches and vicars won't practice inclusion and understanding, the world has a long way to go.

People aren't very good at not being judgy and just being a bit kind really.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:07

well she has explained it to people on here who still don't give a stuff and are getting their judgypants wedged firmly up their arses and calling her a lazy parent, cityfox.

Madhairday · 17/02/2016 16:07

That sounds hard, adrift. I do think it's a shame if you feel you can't 'inflict' that behaviour on others though as that says a lot about society and attitudes which is sad. Do totally understand you don't want to take him somewhere he feels uncomfortable, though.

A lot of children and adults with SN of various kinds go to churches and the congregations wouldn't say that they are inflicting them on them, but that they are glad to welcome them in as God's children. I'd hope so anyway :)

Flowers
inlovewithhubby · 17/02/2016 16:07

I was using the term 'meltdown' deliberately, a specific term used in relation to many conditions on the autistic spectrum. This can look like a tantrum but is not a tantrum. Tantrums don't require adjustments and can be dealt with very differently. No info to suggest OP's child was heading for a meltdown.

CityFox · 17/02/2016 16:07

But Fanjo, has she even spoken the vicar about the possibility of her DC having mild special needs?

CityFox · 17/02/2016 16:08

X post

inlovewithhubby · 17/02/2016 16:10

Fanjo, why are you becoming verbally offensive? This is debate, not personal. Saying insulting things just weakens your arguments.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:11

actually my DD would probably be welcomed into church because she has obvious and severe SN and people would be falling over themselves to appear kind and understanding.

But when it comes to hidden disabilities..no understanding is forthcoming.

Serious hypocrisy.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:12

I'm not saying insulting things inlovewith.

id quite like to sometimes but am not.

CityFox · 17/02/2016 16:13

I think it would be a good idea for OP to discuss this with the vicar. I think she needs to explain how upset she is.

If her DC does have special needs then the congregation should be understanding of that, it could be a learning experience for them. If not then I think a compromise needs to be reached so that both parties feel
Comfortable during a service.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:14

yes she should discuss it.

It's a shame after knowing her for 12 years he didn't show more understanding and trust in her parenting though.

ThenLaterWhenItGotDark · 17/02/2016 16:16

The merailing and putting words into other people's mouths, not to mention the shouting and swearing if someone doesn't agree with you is boringly predictable on this thread.

Even the OP doesn't know if her son has SN yet. But half of MN have him diagnosed and labelled as a child who will never learn to be still and will never learn appropriate behaviour. Some of you sound like you'd actually be very disappointed if he did just turn out to be a lively 4 year old. You might want to think about that before you get your hysterical hats on.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:18

oh the old usual nonsense about shouting because someone doesnt agree and being "hysterical". yes I used a couple of descriptive swear words (sorry Christians) that must mean I am angry. or I just swear sometimes.

and "merailing" even though i dont go to church and DD sits fine.

YAWN

why not mention the "SN brigade" too.

AdriftOnMemoryBliss · 17/02/2016 16:19

if he wants to go somewhere, we go, and i do my best to make it as easy for him as possible, sensory chew, ear defenders, i pack the tablet and earphones if he needs to sit for any part of it, snacks, drinks, scout the exit points if he suddenly decided he needs to go NOW because something is wrong or another person has done or said the wrong thing.

Unfortunately, DS doesn't like going many places and just getting him dressed and out of the house can be a challenge some days.

He has a hidden disability, he is 'high functioning' in that he looks normal and can hold a conversation, but if you spent more than 5 minutes with him, it'd be VERY obvious he's autistic.

In the ops case, i would question what a 4yo is getting out of being made to sit in church through an adult service.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:19

Even the OP doesn't know if her son has SN yet

i would think she does, tbh.

Swipe left for the next trending thread