Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Or is the vicar? Noisy DCs in church

861 replies

drspouse · 14/02/2016 13:32

Background so as not to drip feed, bear with me as this is horrendously long: we go to a fairly naice church in a large historic building, locally there is a sought after church secondary school but none of the church primary schools are over subscribed. We've been going to this church for 12 years and we have two DC, aged 4 and 1. The 4yo is being investigated for mild SN and has always, always been very "lively". DC2 is walking.

The church knows us. Current vicar has been there about as long as our DC1 and baptised both of them. Church has a side chapel which is open to the rest of the pews where there are baby/toddler toys, a mat to play on. One other family (who are new to the country and have a 10 month old) use this baby play area every week.

The 4yo goes to Sunday School in term time, one of us goes with him, as we take it in turns and it doesn't last the whole service, both of us get some time during the service actually in the church. He's just starting to be able to stay in for 10 minutes on his own. DC2 is still lively and, yes, noisy in the side chapel. The other regular family's baby isn't walking yet. When smaller, both he and our DC2 could be quietened by feeding or carrying around.

Because of the pressure for secondary admission, most of the families that come have primary aged children. I can think of a couple of other families who are regulars with young DCs e.g. one Sunday School teacher has an 18 month old but I think she is restrained sat with them on non-Sunday School weeks not in the side chapel.

Today was the first weekend of half term, no Sunday school, there were 2 other children at church apart from our "baby chapel" group, maybe 6 and 8, who were using a construction toy in the side chapel for part of the time. Our DC1 was running around, fairly quietly, but was also throwing a small, soft, non-dangerous teddy up and down and catching it or running to get it. Frankly the only way to stop this would have been to physically restrain DC1 leading to shouting, screaming and kicking. This could be seen from the main church. DC2 was very excited by this and was squeaking, and also as a new walker fell over 2 or 3 times and cried, and was cuddled, and then was quiet.

Half way through someone came in and said "did we know the other room was open, we could go there if we wished". We declined and said no, we wouldn't, because where would be the point in being at church if we were not in the church? we might as well stay home. This is the first time in four years anyone has said anything, and I was massively surprised. It's definitely not the first time we were noisy!

The vicar stopped me on the way out and repeated that something had to be done, that it was distracting, people had complained, and that it was "exciting the other children" (the ones quietly using a construction toy? or the 10 month old who was quiet?) I said that the answer was not for us to go out because there was no point in us going to church if we couldn't be IN church. He repeated that "something must be done".

How does your church run this? Can you give us any ideas for suggestions? We want to bring this up and make some constructive suggestions (though frankly if the church can't put up with noise, it can't put up with children, and it will be left with definitely nobody under 5 and probably nobody under 50).

The historic fabric means a glassed off area is not possible (and I'd feel massively excluded in an aquarium every week!). There's only one area out of the church where smaller children could play (so they couldn't run a creche at the same time as Sunday School). We'd also feel pretty excluded if we couldn't go on non-Sunday School weeks (which is probably 15-20 weeks of the year), and I wouldn't bother if we had to be in an area with "piped church", also. It's not a "praise band" church where listening through an audio or video link gets you the flavour of church, it's a trad but (we thought) friendly church with old fashioned liturgy.

OP posts:
fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:19

sorry to throw a spanner in your desire for a judgyfest

inlovewithhubby · 17/02/2016 16:20

Fanjo - I give you 'judgeypants wedged up arses' - you have enough salient points to make without slinging this sort of playground nonsense.

hobnobsaremyfavourite · 17/02/2016 16:25

Dear god fanjo it must be ehausting being you

hobnobsaremyfavourite · 17/02/2016 16:25

Maybe just maybe and i mean this kindly take a break from threads like this. You Do yourself no favours

GruntledOne · 17/02/2016 16:28

Even the OP doesn't know if her son has SN yet. But half of MN have him diagnosed and labelled as a child who will never learn to be still and will never learn appropriate behaviour. Some of you sound like you'd actually be very disappointed if he did just turn out to be a lively 4 year old. You might want to think about that before you get your hysterical hats on.

Parents do tend to have a very good idea whether their children have SN or not, they don't have to wait the endless months and years for the NHS to get around to assessing and diagnosing to work it out, nor do SN go into limbo just because someone hasn't put a label on them.

I haven't seen anyone say this is a child who will never learn to be still or learn appropriate behaviour. I have however seen people acknowledging that he's only 4 years old and that this is not something that you can necessarily teach by that age, particularly if the child has SNs.

"Hysterical hats" - FFS. And people accuse Fanjo of being insulting. If ever there was a kneejerk facile approach to dismissing inconvenient points because you can't answer them, that is a classic example.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:29

Inlovewith people were saying that the app was a dreadful lazy parent and should be ashamed.

If that isn't having a judgypant wedgie fest then I don't know what is.

GruntledOne · 17/02/2016 16:29

hobnobs, since when did you get to dictate which threads people post on? When you post comments like that you do rather invite the inference that you want to shut out the expression of views that don't accord with yours.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

hobnobsaremyfavourite · 17/02/2016 16:32

nuff said

Mouseymum · 17/02/2016 16:33

I've been reading this thread from the beginning. Am amazed at all the critical replies the op hs received. To me, the disruption that the op describes seems very very minor. Teddy being thrown up and down? A little bit of running with no shoes on, out of the way of the main congregation? The odd squeal from a toddler that is easily soothed? Really?
It seems odd to me that people complained, but the op won't find out until she talks to the Vicar, why this was.

Absolutely, perhaps someone has hearing difficulties and was disturbed, but maybe other solutions could be found, such as any such person sitting nearer the front. The Vicar was certainly rude in speaking to the op the way he did.

I don't think the op acted unreasonably in her efforts to minimise disturbance. And from the op's description, I don't think the children were disruptive enough to be put in another room (I can see the room would have value in the event of a mega trantum but this doesn't appear to be the case).

As to reading prayer books during the sermon, it's highly doubtful the op would be doing this out loud, more likely under her breath. Also, they are out of the way of the main congregation anyway so I'm really not sure this would cause a huge disturbance.
And I think she should be telling the children when it's time to say 'amen', pointing out the bell ringing etc. It will help them understand the structure of the service as they get older. Again, she would have probably whispered or spoken under her breath...

Anyway op, you're lucky(!) as my church doesn't have a Sunday school and I'm stuck at the back trying to manage my nearly 2yo Dd every Sunday! Exhausting! My church isn't perfect but some of my favourite memories from Dd's babyhood include her pottering around the altar (gasp, shock!) in the lady chapel at our Wednesday service, trying to grab the bell and chattering away to the Vicar as she delivered the sermon. The only comment I ever got was how having us both there made church feel like a real family (everyone else was over 60)!

Also to the poster who I think was called molliecoddler from a few pages ago, your toddler grabbing the Christmas tree baubles sounds beautiful. Another poster was horrified that you sounded almost 'proud' of this. Well you should be as far as I'm concerned. He was displaying that beautiful childlike curiosity and absorption of which surely Jesus would have approved? This is stretching it a bit but Martha and Mary popped into my head!

hobnobsaremyfavourite · 17/02/2016 16:35

If thats what you honestly believe you know jack shit about me
Quite frankly you should take a look closer to home when it comes to shutting down discussion

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:36

I didn't say you were shutting down discussion.

I think saying that to me on a thread was patronising and embarrassing to me though

Samcro · 17/02/2016 16:43

wow this thread has been me railed.
the op has not said what mild sn her child might have.
i think most people expect children sn or not to be noisy at times.
but the op has not said if the vicar knows her child might have sn.
because if he doesn't this is nothing to do with inclusion. and most definitely not about random posters children who don't even go to church.

one thing I don't get is how if you go to a church for 12 years you don't know the vicar well enough to have had that kind of conversation.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:47

Other people's posts were about inclusion samcro.

I see you mentioned your DD. I wasnt so crass and bitchy as to accuse you of merailing the thread though.

Cheers for that.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 16:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

hobnobsaremyfavourite · 17/02/2016 16:48

Crass and bitchy
Dear god really???

hobnobsaremyfavourite · 17/02/2016 16:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Samcro · 17/02/2016 16:49

bloody hell fanjo what is your issue?

CooPie10 · 17/02/2016 16:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

hobnobsaremyfavourite · 17/02/2016 16:54

This thread reminds me why i didnt recomend mumsnet to my friend when her dd was diagnosed and nor will i ever suggest she comes here.

AdriftOnMemoryBliss · 17/02/2016 16:56

Fanjo, there is no need for that.

There are a few of us commenting on here who have children with SEN and Disabilities, no-ones opinion is any more valid than anyone elses.

Each of us just have to do what works best for us an our children.

No-one should need to resort to name calling.

LarrytheCucumber · 17/02/2016 16:57

Hobnobs it certainly reminds me of why I gave up on the SN boards :(

PresidentOliviaMumsnet · 17/02/2016 16:59

PEACE AND LOVE people

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 17:06

Well I don't really post on the SN boards. So anyone who is scared off them by my evil bullying ways really needn't be. No need for the sad faces.

Swipe left for the next trending thread