Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Or is the vicar? Noisy DCs in church

861 replies

drspouse · 14/02/2016 13:32

Background so as not to drip feed, bear with me as this is horrendously long: we go to a fairly naice church in a large historic building, locally there is a sought after church secondary school but none of the church primary schools are over subscribed. We've been going to this church for 12 years and we have two DC, aged 4 and 1. The 4yo is being investigated for mild SN and has always, always been very "lively". DC2 is walking.

The church knows us. Current vicar has been there about as long as our DC1 and baptised both of them. Church has a side chapel which is open to the rest of the pews where there are baby/toddler toys, a mat to play on. One other family (who are new to the country and have a 10 month old) use this baby play area every week.

The 4yo goes to Sunday School in term time, one of us goes with him, as we take it in turns and it doesn't last the whole service, both of us get some time during the service actually in the church. He's just starting to be able to stay in for 10 minutes on his own. DC2 is still lively and, yes, noisy in the side chapel. The other regular family's baby isn't walking yet. When smaller, both he and our DC2 could be quietened by feeding or carrying around.

Because of the pressure for secondary admission, most of the families that come have primary aged children. I can think of a couple of other families who are regulars with young DCs e.g. one Sunday School teacher has an 18 month old but I think she is restrained sat with them on non-Sunday School weeks not in the side chapel.

Today was the first weekend of half term, no Sunday school, there were 2 other children at church apart from our "baby chapel" group, maybe 6 and 8, who were using a construction toy in the side chapel for part of the time. Our DC1 was running around, fairly quietly, but was also throwing a small, soft, non-dangerous teddy up and down and catching it or running to get it. Frankly the only way to stop this would have been to physically restrain DC1 leading to shouting, screaming and kicking. This could be seen from the main church. DC2 was very excited by this and was squeaking, and also as a new walker fell over 2 or 3 times and cried, and was cuddled, and then was quiet.

Half way through someone came in and said "did we know the other room was open, we could go there if we wished". We declined and said no, we wouldn't, because where would be the point in being at church if we were not in the church? we might as well stay home. This is the first time in four years anyone has said anything, and I was massively surprised. It's definitely not the first time we were noisy!

The vicar stopped me on the way out and repeated that something had to be done, that it was distracting, people had complained, and that it was "exciting the other children" (the ones quietly using a construction toy? or the 10 month old who was quiet?) I said that the answer was not for us to go out because there was no point in us going to church if we couldn't be IN church. He repeated that "something must be done".

How does your church run this? Can you give us any ideas for suggestions? We want to bring this up and make some constructive suggestions (though frankly if the church can't put up with noise, it can't put up with children, and it will be left with definitely nobody under 5 and probably nobody under 50).

The historic fabric means a glassed off area is not possible (and I'd feel massively excluded in an aquarium every week!). There's only one area out of the church where smaller children could play (so they couldn't run a creche at the same time as Sunday School). We'd also feel pretty excluded if we couldn't go on non-Sunday School weeks (which is probably 15-20 weeks of the year), and I wouldn't bother if we had to be in an area with "piped church", also. It's not a "praise band" church where listening through an audio or video link gets you the flavour of church, it's a trad but (we thought) friendly church with old fashioned liturgy.

OP posts:
fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 10:33

I'd be embarrassed to post such a judgey post

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 10:34

Sometimes allowing a bit of play IS the quietest possible solution.

CityFox · 17/02/2016 10:36

Judgey in what way? Judgemental in that her children had disrupted the service enough for two people to comment?
Judgemental in that I would have personally been embarrassed in that situation? Or judgemental in that parents have a responsibility to ensure they DC aren't being disruptive?

Stormtreader · 17/02/2016 10:39

"I sing one hymn bouncing DC2 on the pew next to me/in my arms, with DC1 possibly dancing along next to me. I enjoy watching DC2 learn to walk longer distances up and down the chapel, and learning to climb a couple of small steps. I enjoy reading the little prayer books to them during the sermon. I tell them "watch out we're going to say Amen now!" and "listen for the bells!". I tell them they can take up teddy/Lego/car for a blessing too."

Theres an awful lot of "I want" and "I enjoy" going on. Maybe the Christian thing to do would be to also consider what the rest of the congregation wants and does/does not enjoy about these things.

inlovewithhubby · 17/02/2016 10:39

Fanjo - we don't know her child has SN. I know of many children who have been investigated and found to have no additional needs.

I have very close friends with SN children, not my own kids but very close links, and do work in educational settings with and around SN children. I also have a background in discrimination law. I'm far from ignorant on the issue. SN children need appropriate boundaries and structure even more than children without additional needs.

Fwiw I have a very strong willed child who has needed masses of help leaning how to behave appropriately. If she can't meet the level of social expectation required, we remove her. Every incident has been a learning curve for her and she has got a little bit better each time. She is now a very well behaved 4 yo, because she's been taught what we consider to be appropriate and inappropriate behaviour. If I did nothing and let her run wild she would do exactly that.

Samcro · 17/02/2016 11:01

lostinmiddlemarch Tue 16-Feb-16 23:23:41
I don't think it's quite that simple if your small child has special needs Samro

maybe if you read my post you will see that my adult child has severe sn. they were a child once

GruntledOne · 17/02/2016 11:54

I know of several children who have been investigated and there has been an initial finding that they have no special needs, only for that to be comprehensively proved wrong later. In one case, the child whom a school swore blind was absolutely fine was permanently excluded by them a few weeks later and ultimately had to be placed in a residential special school. From what OP says about her child, it sounds very much like he may well have SN.

It is also facile to say that all SN children need appropriate boundaries at all times. If, for example, a child is having a meltdown due to the fact that he is overwhelmed by the sensory pressures around him and/or social pressures, seeking to impose boundaries and discipline will only serve to exacerbate his distress. There are times for providing and structure, and there are definitely times when it is better to do whatever keeps the child calm and happy, even if it does involve letting him quietly throw a teddy bear up and catch it.

GruntledOne · 17/02/2016 11:57

Judgemental in that her children had disrupted the service enough for two people to comment

The mere fact that two people comment doesn't put them automatically in the right and OP automatically in the wrong. How often have we seen people being criticised round here for going all purse-lipped when they see a child having a tantrum in public? Yet there are definitely more than two of them.

CityFox · 17/02/2016 12:27

I think the fact that this has only happened once in 12 years, and that two people, the vicar included, felt the need to comment, makes it pretty likely that the children were being disruptive. Whether the OP felt they were or not, they clearly were.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 13:08

Thank goodness for you, GruntledOne Flowers

inlovewithhubby · 17/02/2016 14:42

We don't have enough info to draw conclusions about SEN, even if any of us were expert, which we're not. In some instances of some meltdowns in relation to some diagnoses (so many caveats), relaxing boundaries might be in order. So is removal from the sensorial over-stimulation. And myriad other actions and inactions. But that isn't what the OP referred to in her OP - there is no indication that her lack of intervention was to avoid a meltdown, rather she felt there was nothing wrong or unusual in her parenting approach and felt everyone around her was being unreasonable. Very different.

GruntledOne · 17/02/2016 15:02

. These threads can get seriously depressing. Flowers

GruntledOne · 17/02/2016 15:12

there is no indication that her lack of intervention was to avoid a meltdown

Ahem.

DC2 was most definitely not crying constantly and when younger if feeding didn't sort it for either of them, we took them out straight away. The crying was immediately after falling over and stopped more or less instantly with a cuddle.

We have a choice with DC1 of keeping still and screaming or running around quietly. DC1 did manage to sit with a puzzle book for about 10 minutes during the sermon and then another 5 eating a snack. There's a limit to how long DC1 will sit still for and this week, we chose to put that limited time to use during the sermon

This is PRECISELY why as soon as our DC1 could walk we stopped sitting in the main body of the church and moved to the side chapel SPECIFICALLY set up for small children. We would never let DC1 run around willy nilly in the main part of the church.

"It would be an idea to find some behavioural management strategies for your children at some point but you clearly don't want to be told that."

I've listed them all above
Letting DC1 run around (unseen, quietly, but throwing a silent toy) rather than restraining which leads to kicking and screaming.
Rationing limited sitting down time and snack time to the sermon to minimise disruption.
Picking up DC2 immediately on crying and cuddling leading to immediate cessation of crying.
Positioning ourselves in the dedicated, gated off, play area where the DCs are not seen from the main congregation.
Also not allowing running off when we go up for communion
We have in the past taken the DCs out on tantrumming but there were no tantrums today.

Lack of intervention? No indication that letting DS run around was to avoid a meltdown? Don't let the facts get in the way of a nice bit of judging, will you?

AdriftOnMemoryBliss · 17/02/2016 15:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CityFox · 17/02/2016 15:22

Depressing? Oh ffs.

  1. OP has admItted her children were being noisy.
  1. She was in a place were other people were trying to pray/listen/be calm.
  1. She was asked, kindly by all accounts, to control her DC as they were disturbing people.
  1. She was asked for the first time in four years.
  1. It is not known whether her DC has special needs or not.
Madhairday · 17/02/2016 15:27

But that's such a shame, adrift, because it absolutely should be accessible and conclusive. Sad

Agreed, gruntled and fanjo, this is a depressing thread. So many ignoring the child's SN and weighing in with what they do with their NT child and how it should be one size fits all. The thing is, it shouldn't be. Life is messy. Church is messy - and that shouldn't be just at Messy Church! We should embrace and include all life in all its messiness, noise, issues, chaos, and do all we can to show Christ's love to all.churches should never say 'bring them back when they're older.' Sad

Madhairday · 17/02/2016 15:28

inclusive dyac

Madhairday · 17/02/2016 15:29

Many of the replies are profoundly depressing, CityFox, and I say that as a church leader.

honkinghaddock · 17/02/2016 15:32

I think there is a difference between not taking a child somewhere because it's a place that will distress them and not taking them because others won't like the noise (that you have done as much as you can to prevent) but it is still somewhere that they will get something out of. When my son goes with school he likes the music, touching the building and being with the others, even if he can't always sit with them.

BlackeyedShepherdsbringsheep · 17/02/2016 15:37

Been thinking about it. Without seeing the lay out of the church, it is perhaps difficult to comment on the throwing the toy. however, I do think the vicar handled it badly, even if the throwing was unreasonable.

They should have approached to offer help and left you feeling supported (even if the throwing was undesirable in context of building layout) and offered solutions.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 15:38

its fine to not take your child to anywhere you want AdriftOn.

It is wrong to say that other people should be responsible and exclude their child with SN from a setting because of their behaviour though.

BlackeyedShepherdsbringsheep · 17/02/2016 15:40

ps my views may be coloured by the horror of having ds throw a toy car at one of the church wardens in one church

CityFox · 17/02/2016 15:43

Nobody know whether the child has SN needs or not!!!!

I'm sure if it turns out the child does in fact have special needs then the vicar and congregation will be more accommodating.

pickmeupputmedown · 17/02/2016 15:44

My church service is about an hour and a half long. The first 20 minutes is for hymns. We give the children flags/tambourines to add to their enjoyment and we do at least one childrens action hymn when the children stand at the front . They make a game of it and have to point out the the Pastor at the end which of the adults were not doing the actions correctly:) Its then time for communion and the children are taught that this is the 'quiet time' and tbf the majority of the children understand this. Last week one of my friends children decided to have a tantrum so she took him into another room. After I had taken communion, I went to be with her DC so she could take her communion.

Our church is a family and families understand that children do not always do what you want and you help out where necessary.

The Pastor then does a 5 minute childrens sermon and then they leave for Sunday School/creche which is done on a 3 week rota basis.

I would speak to your Pastor and ask if Sunday school/creche could be done every week. It makes sense to do so. And to the 'old uns' in the church, lighten up, your kids were young once.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 17/02/2016 15:45

until then fuck em if they cant play by the rules then, CityFox?