OhforGodsake just following the logic 
OK then, I'll ignore the bullshit and take your question at face value, because it is an important one.
What should be done?
Honestly, I have no idea. I'm not a politician nor claiming to have all the answers.
But I do know that whatever we do, it should be based on humanity and compassion, not ill-informed xenophobia and dangerous assumptions about why people are doing what they are doing.
The starting point for working out what to do with Calais must be to see them as people in desperate circumstances who are acting as you or I might, given their circumstances. They are not criminals on the whole, nor reckless parents, nor people after our benefits. They are ordinary people like you and me, who have experienced extraordinarily horrific circumstances.
I understand the apparent paradox between wanting to help children there and not wanting to make children more vulnerable by making them a ticket into the UK. But that's not a reason not to help the children in Calais. That's an argument for a very carefully thought out solution, drawing on the experience of agencies who have dealt with similar. It's not a reason to let them rot, deny their existence or dehumanise them.
Also, it's deeply ironic to hear people saying they want out of Europe because of this. Because actually what we need is better coordination between the countries, not worse.
We also need to examine our own role in this and that of our allies. How many of the weapons there have we sold and profited from, directly? How much of this situation (e.g. the creation of ISIS) is a knock-on effect of our illegal invasion and subsequent destruction of Iraq, and other military ops in the region? How much is down to fighting over control of oil? Or to do with the US and allies like us meddling in foreign affairs with US interests at heart? How much devastation and "collateral damage" that people are fleeing from is a result of bombs from our allies and us?
I'm not saying we're at fault and no one else is - of course not. That would be massively far from the truth! It's a complicated situation with many players and no obvious good guys on any sides. But we are responsible for what we support in our name, and that's what concerns me.
We need to learn from the recent past and have our eyes wide open about how the UK's sale of arms encourages war, how waging war creates more war down the line. How climate change and dwindling energy resources is going to make this kind of thing more common over the coming century.
I believe we're in for a bumpy ride, as our governments and media seem unable to be frank and honest about what's going on. They should be examining the root causes of these massive movements of people, not talking about "swarms" and encouraging people to think of refugees as possibly terrorists, instead of the very people who are fleeing those terrorists! We should be putting in place constructive systems and structures that help people, not building bigger fences, because there's more of this to come, and anyway a fence can only be so high. And what if we end up needing asylum ourselves?
So, no I have no answers. Mainly because I like to think about things thoroughly before saying I have an "answer" rather than make assumptions and knee-jerk proclamations, and I'm not there yet.
Like many posters here I suspect, I am scared for what the future will bring for our DC. But the difference is I think it's a bleaker future if we refuse refugees asylum because we're too busy being xenophobic to ask what's going on. We need to recognise the victims of war, of ISIS, and of the meddling of foreign interests from all sides, as ordinary people just like us, not the enemy.
I think if allow fascism to rise its ugly head - and the signs are that's what we're doing - then the future looks pretty bleak from where I'm standing.