We've had over 2 weeks of 2 year old sleep regression.
We're still getting undisturbed sleep, but it's one hell of a job to get DC to actually go to sleep in the first place. It can take anything from 30 minutes to several hours.
A drag though it is, I'm grateful that we're getting our sleep, and all we're losing out on is our evenings, which is only spent cleaning or watching TV anyway, so no big loss in the big picture really.
But every time DH is present, he hurries it. Like today, DC was playing - but at least not crying - whilst I sat in the bedroom beside the bed.
After 15-20 minutes DH said it wasn't working and so it was time to push DC out in the pushchair and try to encourage sleep that way instead. I gave in as I am sick of fighting DH and trying to tell him to please be more patient.
Yesterday evening I asked DH to sit and talk to me on the stairs because that only took 10 minutes for DC I fall asleep the last 2 times we did that, which to my mind is brilliant progress. DH said its not normal to sit on the stairs and did a screwing-finger-into-side-of-head motion at me, implying I am somehow crazy to even consider it. He just can't (or won't) see the big picture and view it as short term pain for long term gain.
I'm getting pissed off with his attitude towards it and his failure to accept it will take a long time. Every night. Possibly for a few more weeks yet. And his inability to give it time is stressing me out more than the process of sitting with a child who refuses to sleep!
I think the problem is that DH wants to reintroduce pacifiers, which he believes was the cause of this problem in the first place. Technically it wasn't, as DC slept beautifully the first few nights until getting a sick bug 4/5 nights later, then it all went horribly wrong and has stayed that way. Perhaps it's coincidentally a 2 year old sleep regression - we might never know.
But dc's teeth are quite pronounced at the top, and two independent local dentists have strongly advised not returning to the pacifier because there is a strong possibility that it will cause permanent damage, even at 2 years old. When I said Dr Google suggests it's only a massive problem around the age of 4, I was told it's still a big risk, especially as we're already seeing visible signs of malocclusion, and they wouldn't suggest it's worth taking. My health visitor also reiterated this.
But, for as long as DH is sitting on the sidelines hankering after some pacifier reintroduction, I feel he will not get the patience game and it is doing my head in 
Aibu?