Cruikshank when did the education system move away from teaching of Scottish history? I was in school in the 80s and I have always thought it would have been quite helpful to have been taught a bit more than Bannockburn, Stirling Bridge, William Wallace, Mary Queen of Scots and John Knox. All our 1st and 2nd World War studies focussed mostly on the experiences of the Scots too, as did anything we did on British colonialism. I didn't take history beyond 2nd year high school though, so maybe the exam syllabus was a bit less Scotland- centric? I could really have done with learning about British Kings after the Unio, Nelsn, Wellington and stuff like the Russian Revolution, have always felt my historical education was far too inward-looking.
Returning to the OP's question, I am from a very long line of Scots who never left their small corner of the Central belt until I bucked the trend by going to University in England and I have not lived there since I was 18 ( I am now 41). I am married to an Englishman.
However I am fiercely proud of my very strong accent and get very defensive if accused of having lost it and the things I treasure about the Scottish identity are the very very dry and sarcastic sense of humour, the ability to make fun of ourselves, the fondness for a drink, the general resilience and willingness just to get on with things, the strong sense of what is value for money and the openness- I was always caught by surprise after spending time in London when shop assistants in my home town would chat away to me at the checkout. I also really like bagpipes and had a small pipe band at my wedding.
On the downside I echo what posters above have said about sectarianism, it is truly abhorrent and a source of great shame to me.