lullabyneedy - Plenty I'm disputing that VAT raised is higher than what it costs the NHS.
I'm really confused here. As far as I can tell, you were responding to this (I don't know who originally wrote this, I've lost track!):
The revenue that smoking brings pays for every bit of treatment a smoker can ever have. The smoker does not bleed the nhs. Smoking costs the nhs, say 20 billion, smokers pay in tax three times the amount. This is a FACT. Where the government choses to spend that is up to them.
Her figures are plucked from thin air but the principle is sound. Tax revenue from tobacco sales more than covers the cost to the NHS of treating smoking-related disease. In fact, it's six times as much, not three times.
You responded by saying the stats from 2012-2013 showed a 12.3 billion VAT revenue.
This is incorrect. That's the total for VAT plus tobacco duties. It appears to be only you who is arguing about VAT on its own, which by the way is around 2.8 billion, so still higher than the NHS cost.
Icimoi - Plenty, in quoting the ASH statistics, why have you omitted the calculation that the total cost to society of smokers is £12.9 billion a year?
Because I was responding to a specific point
There was an argument going on (as there often is) about the cost of smoking to the NHS vs. the tax raised on tobacco products. I dug up the figures and posted them with the aim of bringing a little clarity to the discussion. That worked well 