Sorry. I assumed most posters knew the background.
When we first left ex, we had no TV. This was a huge, huge concern to ex. Who berated me frequently on the matter. A few weeks after dd2 got some pet rats for her birthday. Someone gave me a TV and I got freeview in, but the aeriel broke shortly thereafter and I never got it fixed because freeview was never used.
He then started berating me over the rats. I wasn't a good girl and wouldn't do as I was told so he told of me to the school, child services and anyone else who would listen to him. Child services saw no reason to visit. The school are happy with the home conditions and do not see the rats as a concern and remind him every time he goes to the school that they have invited him in to discuss dd2's progress, not my house or pets.
The rats were a major, major issue for him. Dd2 would often come home from visits telling me all kinds of horrific tales about rats, disease and smells etc.
Things went quiet on the rat front after his most recent failed reporting of the situation about 2 weeks ago.
Now we are back to the TV being an issue. I'm sure if I order Sky, there'll be something else to whinge about or the rats will become an issue again.
I now refuse to speak to him unless it directly relates to the children and their well being, so often get second hand whinges from him via dd2. If she thinks we are not a normal family for having no live tv, it's because he has told her that we are not a normal family for having no live tv, in an attempt to get a rise from me, knowing what he says will be relayed to me.
So since he clearly wants us to have live TV and believes to be of major concern that we do not have it, he should pay for it, should he not?