Itsbetterthan Yes things are better than they were of course and that's only good. But I think we should still always be striving for better, for complete equality. Cultural attitudes are a big part of that.
You seem to be looking for heavily positive discrimination in statistical terms, rather than complete equality. Unless you pick very specific magazines, there are plenty of WOC in magazines such as Heat and Now, etc., certainly enough if not more to equal or better the percentage of WOC in the UK. As pointed out above, it is Northern European country with a large majority of white people.
I do think that even if we had 50% or more WOC in magazines, you would still go through their racial ancestry with a fine toothpick, and find some flaw that you could criticise. And that of course, wouldn't be anywhere near complete equality, because white people in the UK way outnumber WOC.
What I'm saying is that you seem to be pushing for some unattainable, very vague and undefinable goal, rather than dealing with the important issues.
So perhaps you could do something slightly more quantifiable. Why don't you get the updated percentage figure on WOC versus all women living in the UK, go through 5 of this week's media type magazines, and count them. Do not rule out Americans, or WOC of mixed race, those who style their hair, or those who have been airbrushed, as you have tried to do in the past. Don't just pick really obscure fashion mags which are dependent on the stream of young Eastern European models (most of them aren't British either). Pick something like Now, Heat, Closer, OK, and Look. I did it with Heat magazine upthread, and WOC were over-represented in percentage terms.
And its getting very predictable when posters try to close down anyone who disagrees with them or challenges them by idiotic comments, such as "you're denying racism", "you're illegible", "you have demons", etc..