I read this at my mum's earlier and TBH, my first instinct, on seeing the headline and accompanying sad face picture was to feel sympathy - as I would for any homeless person.
But once I started reading so many inconsistencies jumped out and by the end I felt really cross with them, for all the reasons you lot have already pointed out. The most gobsmacking of which was their decision NOT to buy - anything - when they realised around £200k (can't remember exact figure) in, I think, 2006. The article seemed to imply that for some god-knows-what-reason they decided to rent instead and it all disappeared in 3 (IIRC) years ! Which is going some by most people's standards surely ?
And okay, even if you accept they'd been very very foolish in the past and are now 'stuck', can't even afford a rental deposit, 1st month's rent etc., I find it hard to believe the bloke's daughters can't help them with that (assuming no bad blood between them and no dreadful circumstances applicable to them). If your parents were in dire straights most people - unless they were genuinely on their uppers themselves would scrape up a 1000, 1500 or so wouldn't they.
The storage thing doesn't add up, the Travelodge thing doesn't add up, turning down work because she doesn't want to be apart from him doesn't add up. It's not easy to find work for many ATM, and especially at her age, yet she freely admits she's been offered work - so why not bloody take it. She could work for 2 or 3 months - only - to get a rental deposit together and then resign for God's sake if it was that awful (she's not earning now so they'd be no worse off) but they would then be able to rent somewhere, would be able to apply for housing benefit, would be able to have a fixed address as a gateway to other benefits perhaps as well as the other opportunities and advantages of having a fixed abode.
Just doesn't make sense.
Whenever I read the DM I'm regularly astonished by some of the stories they print which are so full of holes and fantastical. The online version is so often appallingly written to boot - spelling mistakes, contradictions within the same piece (one minute's someone's 47 then they're 53 ...), grammatical errors, incorrect captions attached to photos identifying their subject as someone completely different etc etc etc. How half the stuff gets past its editor is beyond me .......