Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not understand how parents can leave their babies to cry?

144 replies

Beatrixemerald · 09/11/2014 10:35

I just cannot leave my baby to cry, even fora few minutes (exception to this is when driving alone with dd). I have such a strong physical response, I cant do anything and just have to comfort her immediately. She is 5 months old and is always easily consoled so I am always able to comfort her.
My grandmother told me that babies need to cry sometimes (don't believe this) and a friend of mine was suprised I couldn't just tune it out (she also has a baby of a similar age).
To keep my baby happy I am now a sling-wearing/co-sleeping/ebf mother which I never really planned to be, but I just cant stand my baby being unhappy.
I am totally crazy arent I?

OP posts:
Beatrixemerald · 09/11/2014 11:19

Alpaca - your post made me feel much better :-)

OP posts:
Mintyy · 09/11/2014 11:19

Oh that's sad.

Artandco · 09/11/2014 11:20

Some just cry a while. Ds2 could be in a sling, breastfeeding and half being rocked and sung to and would still cry occasionally, no much More I could do

parallax80 · 09/11/2014 11:20

I just cannot leave my baby to cry, even fora few minutes

Twins

Enough said

MollyBdenum · 09/11/2014 11:22

Beatrix, it's ok as long as you have a baby (urgent response) and a toddler (delayed response unless there is a hazard) and babies are generally portable. The only thing you can't do is take the baby out for a walk to calm down. If the older child is in preschool, you can manage that, too.

alpacasosoft · 09/11/2014 11:27

I have such a strong physical response

I think this is what the OP is referring to-not I don't want to let my baby cry but the strong and overwhelming physical response when the baby cries.
No one ever talks about it.

Beatrixemerald · 09/11/2014 11:31

Alpaca - that is exactly what I meant. It has really come as a shock to me.

OP posts:
paxtecum · 09/11/2014 11:34

I have a friend who used to leave her babies to cry.
The babies would get so distressed they would vomit but eventually fall asleep.
The parents would then have to change the baby's vomit covered clothes and cot sheets, and of course the baby would wake up.

I was very good and kept my mouth firmly shut, but I hated listening to it and thought it totally pointless.

DoughnutSelfie · 09/11/2014 11:35

I think that's it's a lower brain cortex thing from when we lived in caves. A crying baby might attract bears or sabre tigers. Non scientific opinion ofc.

MiaowTheCat · 09/11/2014 11:36

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Beatrixemerald · 09/11/2014 11:39

Miaow - I have found the responses generally really kind and helpful. Thank you

OP posts:
Mrsjayy · 09/11/2014 11:43

One of mine whinged grumped and cried just before she went to sleep no comfort would have stopped that of course I had the natural response to comfort her we all do but rushing to a crying baby can be stifiling for both parent and child ime

alpacasosoft · 09/11/2014 11:46

I don't think the OP is seeking validation Miaow stop being so nasty.

I think this thread shows that it is something rarely discussed and probably not experienced unless you BF < awaits flaming>
I often read threads on here when Mothers describe their extreme discomfort and unease when their babies are being handed around and they cant bear it and think "aha" !
I literally couldn't bear it ,it was overwhelming.
It eased as they got older and I stopped BF.

ghostvitruvius · 09/11/2014 11:47

I am similar to you OP, especially with my first - it physically hurt to hear him cry! But I was also lucky that both my babies have been easily settled with cuddles/boob so I didn't have to get used to them crying - it was a pretty rare event that they couldn't be comforted immediately.

MoreSnowPlease · 09/11/2014 11:48

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

ghostvitruvius · 09/11/2014 11:51

Beatrix - I also deliberately didn't go for a very small age gap because I didn't feel I would be able to meet both children's needs in the way I wanted/needed to if there was only a year or two between them. If you wait til your first is 3-4 years old before having a new baby it is much easier and you don't need to leave the baby to cry (ime).

formerbabe · 09/11/2014 11:53

Op...I'm going to guess this is your first baby.

Try a toddler and a newborn and then get back to us.

Hairtodaygonetomorrow · 09/11/2014 11:56

I agree crying is designed to provoke agitation/arousal and get the parent to react. However, you have only one child, so you can do that fairly easily. Speak to the mother of twins or triplets about crying- with the best will in the world you cannot meet two babies needs all the time (if you are on your own)- and one cries while you start feeding the other, one cries while you are changing the other (who may also cry) and so on. Add in a small toddler who may also cry next to you while the others are crying!

You aren't unreasonable to want to meet your child's needs, but you haven't got a baby who cried incessantly even when you do this and you don't have multiple children where you couldn't meet every need simultaneously even if you wanted, so your post comes over a bit naive.

DixieNormas · 09/11/2014 12:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ShadowKat · 09/11/2014 12:03

DS1 was one of those babies who tended to cry himself to sleep. If anyone tried picking him up to comfort him when he was doing that, he'd generally get even more upset and overstimulated and it would make it all worse. But there was a difference between his crying to sleep cries and his other cries.

DS2 much preferred being cuddled or fed to sleep, but sometimes I had to let him cry for a bit because I was dealing with DS1 and had to finish sorting DS1 out first. I found that distressing for me as well as DS2 but it was simply impossible to go to him as quickly as he'd have liked at all times.

dorasee · 09/11/2014 12:03

Obviously a first timer with a very easy baby. Lucky you. I've been a slinger, a co-sleeper, a non co-sleeper, a formula feeder earlier than I would have liked, a breast feeder longer than most would have been...you know, each child brings different challenges to the table and at different stages. And mothers are only human, doing the best they can. Some are better than others, this is true. But your post only serves to make others feel a bit badly. I know this wasn't your intention. And well done you for being a pillar of patience. I mean that. Crying, within reason, is not terrible. It is great exercise for the lungs and remember, it's communication. I don't do the cry it out thing myself. I have a 5 month old crier and it is extremely hard at times. He's not my first and I can handle it, but I have moments when I really struggle.

Borttagen · 09/11/2014 12:05

OP I can totally understand what you mean - my baby crying is so distressing I need to stop them crying for MY sake as well as theirs. It makes me panic and feel really awful - and I didn't BF either of them. My DC2 has special needs and screams his head off still at 18 months if left down and I don't find it any easier. I have to let him cry to cook dinner or do other jobs but am panicked and upset doing them and feel upset and guilty for ages afterwards. I'm expecting an unplanned DC3 in the next few weeks and dreading it as one of them will have to cry and I know my stress levels will be through the roof.

I would give anything to be less bothered by it and to actually feel the calm I try to project while saying 'I'm just making dinner, I'll be there in a second'.

It does get a bit easier (DC1 is 3) but mainly because they don't cry as much and start to communicate verbally with you.

claraschu · 09/11/2014 12:12

I'm with you OP. Small babies crying cause me extreme distress; I feel I have to pick them up and comfort them. I think it's an instinct.

MollyBdenum · 09/11/2014 12:23

Do you find that holding the baby lessens the effect? DC2 hardly ever cried, but DD1 did have periods of inconsolable crying lasting several hours and I did find that holding the baby close while moving briskly took the edge off. I think the exercise side of things helped with the adrenaline response, but the closer the contact the less distressing it was (eg skin to skin better than through clothes, and baby on chest/stomach better than baby elsewhere).

trashcanjunkie · 09/11/2014 12:27

I had my first baby at 18 and still took a lot of 'advice' from my mother, who was nuts. She was one of eight kids and her younger brother had fallen from his high chair and banged his head. Although my granny had him checked thoroughly and pronounced fine, my uncle had in fact sustained a tiny fracture on his skull. He cried a lot after that, and it greatly distressed granny, who already had three older dcs under the age of six. She knew something was wrong, but felt nobody would listen, until my uncle developed meningitus on the brain, thought to have been caused/associated with the fracture. He recovered but it left a lasting legacy in the family.

It was completely unacceptable to let the baby cry, ever. This was passed on to me by my mum, and although I agree in principle, it meant that I was completely unsupported when I wanted to implement some kind of routine with my first ds. In fact she'd go in and pick him up from his cot if I put him down and he cried. He was five years old before he went to bed alone, and to be honest at that point I was nearly deranged due to having zero personal time without him, and being forced to lie down next to him every night for hours while he fell asleep. To this day (he's 18 now) I feel it's negatively impacted on our relationship and also his sleep patterns. He literally never got left to cry. Ever.

My 2nd and 3rd ds are twins. I had them when ds1 was eight, and by then I had escaped my mothers clutches. I certainly never planned on leaving them to cry, but as I lived in an upstairs flat, was a single parent and had the school run to do with elder ds from day one, there were times when I'd be loading babies into the pram, and one or the other would be howling. Nothing I could possible do if we are trying to get out the door, and I knew they'd been bf all through the night and early hours, then washed and changed. They just were tired and being forced into coats etc and stuffed into the pram. Often I'd put one baby in the pram, who's start to cry as I ran back up for the next baby. By the time I returned (two minutes later) the baby would be asleep.

I did cc when they were 11 months old. I stood just outside the bedroom (still co-sleeping at this point) and rapid returned them if they crawled to the edge of my double bed (with banks of pillows on the floor in case they fell, which they never did) It took a few weeks. They are nine now and have amazing sleeping patterns, go to bed very nicely and sleep through perfectly.

I discussed this with a HV. I know some HV are rubbish, but I thought she had an interesting point. She said, that if baby's needs are constantly and perfectly met (we were talking about the older baby, six months plus) then that baby would not develop any coping mechanisms for handling stress.

Whether that's true or not, I don't know, but I do know of the three children, my eldest copes the least well in stressful situations. The younger two, who are very different to each other, certainly manage it better.

Swipe left for the next trending thread