Other than stating her opinions, what was nasty about what she said?
The original report stated there were a number of people saying a number of things, amongst which were some threats. Did she make any threats?
She seems to have been held responsible/blamed for everything that had been said.
I think the definition of 'troll' seems to have morphed into something other than its orginal meaning too, it used to mean a person that posted things simply to stir or cause anger/upset, in this womans case, it seems that what she posted was simply what she thought.
When did opinions become 'trolling'?