Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think pre-paid benefits cards are a stigmatizing, punitive scheme?

464 replies

ArsenicFaceCream · 29/09/2014 16:22

Just announced at the Conservative Party conference.

They will initially be 'voluntary' for claimants with addiction issues, apparently.

But of course the intention is to roll it out.

Universal Credit is going national in February so this could get interesting, given that UC will be paid to working claimants as well as those not working.

OP posts:
Dawndonnaagain · 30/09/2014 20:14

I'm a carer, so how will my carers allowance be paid? I used to get it from the post office, it's not labelled, I don't have a sign that says I'm getting carer's allowance. More than once, I was judged, loudly, for picking up benefits at my age when I could quite obviously work. I lived in a village at the time and at one point I was refused a bottle of wine because the chap that ran the shop didn't think those on benefits should be allowed to spend his money on booze. It was only my fucking birthday, but I wasn't going to stand in a shop and justify my existence. I'm still not going to.
Oh, and round here, the local market is far, far cheaper for fruit and veg than any supermarket: six giant baking potatoes for £2.00 at the moment. Can't get that in Tesco. They're so big, we share one between two, cheese and salad and we're stuffed. So, that's two spuds for a meal, two later in the week for mash for fouk and then roasties even later in the week. I can shop for four of us on the market for less than ten pounds, that's fruit and veg. They won't be taking cards of any description.

Dawndonnaagain · 30/09/2014 20:14

for four

Viviennemary · 30/09/2014 20:18

I can't see the objection to this. If people got part of their entitlement in food vouchers it would mean at least they would always have food and not face their children and themselves going hungry. It is certainly worth trying out. And make it so people can opt out if they simply can't face using a voucher at the checkout because others will think they are worthless. It's just nonsense.

joanofarchitrave · 30/09/2014 20:20

Vivienne, have you read much of the thread? It may be that you don't agree with the objections, but there ARE objections.

ArsenicFaceCream · 30/09/2014 20:22

Have you RTFT Viv?

OP posts:
ArsenicFaceCream · 30/09/2014 20:24

Ha X post joan Grin

It's getting awfully repetitive, isn't it?

OP posts:
Viviennemary · 30/09/2014 20:24

I've read some of the thread. I think it's a good idea and I wouldn't mind vouchers for food. But if people think it's a bad idea and wouldn't want them then that's fine. Childcare vouchers are already in use. Can't see the difference.

joanofarchitrave · 30/09/2014 20:25

That Red Cross report I linked to is horrible Sad

It's so frustratingly inefficient as a system.

Idontseeanysontarans · 30/09/2014 20:25

Of course a huge sticking point to all this is that it's a total technological fuck up waiting to happen. There is no way the system would cope, people would be waiting for weeks without food and whatever else our lords and masters deemed appropriate for them, there would be loud noises from certain quarters and 'lessons would be learnt' while people went hungry.

ArsenicFaceCream · 30/09/2014 20:26

More than once, I was judged, loudly, for picking up benefits at my age when I could quite obviously work. I lived in a village at the time and at one point I was refused a bottle of wine because the chap that ran the shop didn't think those on benefits should be allowed to spend his money on booze. It was only my fucking birthday, but I wasn't going to stand in a shop and justify my existence. I'm still not going to.

Shock

The change from orderbook to BACS payment was introduced when I was receiving carer's allowance. I was very glad of it

OP posts:
Viviennemary · 30/09/2014 20:26

I've read the thread and I don't see why just because I don't agree then I mustn't have understood or rtt. I'm not saying it should be brought out for everybody but I think it's worth a try.

handcream · 30/09/2014 20:33

I agree with vivien. Just because it doesn't suit you and your situation it doesnt mean it shouldn't be trialled

ArsenicFaceCream · 30/09/2014 20:38

handcream

How can it possibly suit my situation?

We don't even get Child Benefit any more. Would you mind explaining what you're talking about?

OP posts:
GarlicSeptimus · 30/09/2014 20:38

Just because it doesn't suit you and your situation it doesnt mean it shouldn't be trialled - Because it might suit addicts and their situation? What exactly are you implying here?

ArsenicFaceCream · 30/09/2014 20:40

I'm not sure who she's addressing Garlic. I can't make sense of it either way.

OP posts:
joanofarchitrave · 30/09/2014 20:41

Fair enough Vivienne. What got me was the sentence 'I can't see the objection' which sounded like you couldn't imagine what objections there could be.

From my point of view it's been trialled for the past 5 years with a small group and has been a punitive failure. A similar voucher-based system was trialled for ten years before that (well - ten years off and on) and was such a failure that it was stopped twice by Parliament. The US food stamps system has been in place for decades and is problematic and full of fraud as well.

GarlicSeptimus · 30/09/2014 20:42

No, Arse Grin It's very easy to get a sense of superiority when you can't think rationally!

BeyondRepair · 30/09/2014 20:51

YES its awful and something I hope people will march against if it comes in.

I can see the issues - and yes some people will be wasting the little they have on crap but you cant go down this route.

ArsenicFaceCream · 30/09/2014 20:52

No Garlic. It just annoys me, this accusation that all objections must be motivated by current self-interest.

I've been quite open across multiple threads about the fact that I was only able to escape to DV due the welfare state and that my DC and I lived on benefits for a while. I like to think I'd have empathy anyway. I'm pretty sure I used to anyway, but I didn't have proper understanding TBH.

People like handcream and fishwife turn up on the thread and imply that the only possible objection is from people with something to lose. That needs challenging.

OP posts:
meglet · 30/09/2014 20:53

Yanbu. For all the reasons already listed.

-the cards will be sold for cash on the black market.

  • people will be restricted to buying higher price goods instead of grabbing bargains.

Basically I doubt very much it will make a blind bit of difference to addicts. It will only make life even harder for their families and other benefit recipients.

fuzzpig · 30/09/2014 21:17

The ramifications are terrifying.

jacks365 · 30/09/2014 21:31

Those who think this is a good idea and would work for some people can you answer me some questions as to how certain things could work?

How do you pay for utilities specifically water. How do you pay for bus fares. any additional costs ie non uniform day at school.

If you get so much as cash and so much on a card which can only be used for food who decides how much you have to budget for food, I know my food shop is inconsistent over the month.

ilovechristmas1 · 30/09/2014 21:37

funny how the Government can spend £££££££££ on helping America fighting wars

it seems there's a bottomless pit were thats concerned

but its ok to constantly change the goalposts in the welfare system,save a few quid here and there,belittle claimants to the point of despair and uncertanty

KissMyFatArse · 30/09/2014 21:39

Ilovechristmas

Totally agree, people relying on benefits, food banks, charity yet we can afford to go to war. Hmm

ArsenicFaceCream · 30/09/2014 21:43

any additional costs ie non uniform day at school.

YY. A thousand petty ways in which people will be dehumanised and pushed outside society. Especially children.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread