I WAS being facetious about the Duke of Norfolk, and probably shouldn't have done.
But I was thinking at the time how silly the argument was about rich and poor Catholics. And I think he is he most well-known UK Catholic, though I've no idea whether he has a home in Scotland - I suspect he hasn't. It's neither here nor there anyway. Having grown up in Glasgow I know lots of Catholics and some are okay for money, others may be classed as 'poor'. Some are Yes, others are No.
DH is a lapsed Catholic but still identifies thus. And is married to me - which means in RC terms he's living in sin and has 4 bastard sons.
We are poor, relatively, and all Yes. But on its own it means very little, in fact nothing statistically.
I think the campaign is still very close. Which is why both 'sides' are so busy doing and saying what they are. My brother has just texted me to say his figures at end of a day's canvassing in a small town in the central belt are: Yes, No, Undecided - 91, 39, 37. That's still a lot of Undecideds. On these figs alone it means very little but is encouraging for those of us who want a Yes majority.
I haven't decided whether to put up our poster yet. I've heard bad things about the No campaign and we've had our windows broken before for less. 