At the same time thousands of English jobs are sacrificed in Portsmouth to bride racist Jocks into voting No.
That statement (I know it isn't your own WildThong) is all kinds of wrong. Use of 'Jocks' and assuming that No voters are racist isn't very good.
I just meant public opinion in the way that it will be the ones looking for contracts who will decide, and not the public.
What do you think of the "Aye" lot saying that post "Naw" there will be repercussions against Scotland?
Well, I don't think it's scaremongering. Of course it won't be as bad as rUK and Scotland going to war or anything on that scale, but WM aren't going to look kindly on Scotland for it. We will almost certainly be hit with cuts to try to align us with rUK, so it's reasonable to assume that free education and prescriptions will be under threat.
Boris Johnson has already made comments saying he would favour it, also saying, for example, there is "no need" for new powers for Scotland. Although he isn't in power, I don't doubt it's a common sentiment amongst some MPs at least. And the ones at the forefront, such as Cameron and Miliband, can't say such things due to their positions, but who knows if they're thinking it or not.