Me again.
Maybe the evening crowd will answer the question I asked earlier about exactly what the Scottish interests that are peculiarly Scottish are that are never addressed by the Westminster government.
I ask genuinely as I realise I'm not as informed as some other people on this thread. I'm usually only moderately interested in politics and didn't start researching the possible reasons to vote yes.
I was originally a no voter in principle - backwards step, dismantling things at great cost and effort for an understandable, but IMO not worthy enough cause. Then I realised that lots of intelligent people I know are planning to vote yes and that were things I didn't know about, eg the CAP funds not getting to the Scottish farmers. Though that all sounds very complicated and involved and open to debate. I'm not sure if I approve of being a nuclear power either.
I don't think there are any significant cultural differences - but yes voters don't argue that any more, usually. But if there are genuine economic interests peculiar to Scotland, rather than say beef or dairy farming - which might contribute more to the Scottish economy but is also a part of rUK economy - as there are cattle in rUK - then I've yet to hear what they are.
I understand the accusation of the Westminster parliament being London-centric though that's debatable, but that would be a cause for complaint for everyone outside of London. And in the event of a yes majority I predict an Edinburgh-centric Scottish government. Edinburgh has a lot in common with London already, except for its size. Many a Scottish person has never been further north than Inverness....