No sorry I'm still standing by what I said.
There is benefits to bf yes, but the outcome is at the most minimally different if not at all different to babies ff fed.
I bf dd to 12 months, my great nephew was ff. absolutely no difference in health, weight in our children.
The horrendous pressure my niece felt under to try an bf was ridiculous, I'll say to you what I said to her when she was sobbing because some twat of a midwife had berated her for not 'trying hard enough'
' look there is absolutely nothing wrong with formula, I was brought up on it, so were you, so was the entire family.
Are we Ill? Stupid? Poor health? Overweight ( well yes me a bit but that's due to cake not ff)
Studies say all kinds of shit, it generally doesn't mean anything. There are sick and healthy bf babies, same as ff babies.
Now cheer up and pass me the bottle'
As you can see I am very scientific 
But seriously why keep insisting on much better bf/ ff feed is. In the end it makes sod all difference.
Those of you keep ramming bf down everyone's throats we get it. You want to feel superior, like you are the ones doing the best for your baby and that's lovely. But get off your high horse. It not some magic power, and in real life, not studies, it doesn't turn your baby into an all infection/ disease battling super child 
And everyone who insist bf is disgusting, well now you are just weird aren't you? Don't like it, then don't look. Agree with pp bet you think nothing of pg 3, because after all that's the natural function of boobs isn't it.
Seriously, with you two groups arguing against each other no wonder so many women feel attacked for their choices.