"I would get fucking shitty with anyone who thought they could take the choice I've made for her away from me" .... er, this is exactly the sort of "FC enforcement" which makes me wonder what happened to freedom of choice. (And who the bad people are in this debate.)
Was that really necessary AgentZigzag, or were you joking?
I do feel quite strongly about FC being nonsense, & wanted to make my/another point of view known on here, (safely/anonymously), because in real life, people, (like you?), can get very emotional and nasty, making a proper discussion difficult.
FYI, I have absolutely no interest in spoiling anyone's fun. (As I already said, I think I am a nice person. And I hope you would think so too!)
I am just annoyed at the pressure from the FC brigade to keep the truth safe from their kids' ears at all costs. (Why should I have to worry?)
I haven't spoiled anyone's FC belief up till now, (as far as I know) & I have previously stated that I have played along in the past, to keep everyone happy. So why are you so threatening in your reply?
Where's MY freedom eh?
What if (for example) you believe in ghosts and I don't ... and I say so. Will you sort me out if I say anything (at all) with which you do not agree, or which you don't like?
It's just a principle that I want to establish here ... ie that I don't think I should have to pretend there's a FC, in front of other people's children who may be FC believers. (Why am I labelled "mean" for that?)
Why can't the onus (on keeping the myth going) be 100% upon those who want their kids to believe? You could tell them something like ... "only some people believe in FC" and then if someone (like me) tells them "hey, there's no FC you know", you can say "they are only saying there's no FC because ".
It's a simple solution, and it means that I don't have to worry about what I say, which seems a lot fairer than forcing me into 'playing' the "FC-is-real" game?