Now, I am certain that you will not agree with the sources or the contents, but it would be useful for the debate if rather than just rubbishing them, you could point by point refute, with reasoning.
You want someone else to critically analyse the "yes" campaign's poor attempts at literature so they can change them and make them better? For free?
"Will an independent Scotland address the unacceptable levels of poverty we are tolerating at present?"
OK, problem here is that is a loaded question - one which suggests the answer in its wording. It is biased from the outset, and everything that follows is by analogy going to be equally biased. It is not neutral.
"We’ve produced a number of materials making the case for independence on this basis. The campaign centres on our document “Yes to a Just Scotland” which was published in response to a consultation by the STUC called “A Just Scotland”.
You can see our publication here and our campaign briefing and fairness leaflet can be downloaded from our Resources section.
Ultimately, the details of what social policy would be implemented in Scotland will depend on who is elected to form the government in May 2016.
Similarly, we can’t say with total precision what UK government social policy will be after the election in May 2015. However, we can speak about the general direction of travel.
We know, for example, that Scottish MPs and the Scottish Parliament are opposed to many of the Westminster government’s welfare reforms – and it is very likely that some of these measures would be among the first to be repealed on independence.
Already the current Scottish Government has committed itself to abolishing the unfair bedroom tax, and to reforming universal credit single household payments which create barriers for second adults, usually women, from taking employment if they wish to.
One part of the transition to independence will involve the drawing up of a written constitution and there will be a debate about whether rights to welfare and housing and other social rights might be successfully included in the written constitution that would be drawn up.
Yes Scotland believes that the more issues such as welfare and fairness play a part in the independence debate, the greater the impetus there will be to create a fairer society after a Yes vote has been obtained.
In contrast, both the UK Government and the Westminster Labour party are signed up to the austerity agenda.
We believe the political parties in Scotland, from the SNP and Greens to Scottish Labour would choose a different approach.
Only a Yes vote in 2014 offers a better way."
Its not really necessary to go through this point by point, because exactly the same comment can be applied to all of it:
"no supporting evidence provided to back up points. No substantive content. Biased, non-neutral side given only. This is like something a schoolchild would write as it doesn't even approach first year university level."
Apart from the comments on planning, the Common Weal stuff can be attributed the same criticisms. I am shocked that academics want to attach their names to such generalised poor quality comments with no evidence to back it up.