"being white has never held me back and i have not been judged or expected to act a certain way because of my colour, it is never an issue
I just dont get why people get so offended when someone calls them a black... or a indian.... etc - if you are black or indian then what is the problem? - apart from obviously the bitch/slut/ twat insult that came after. "
If a person uses an aspect of that person that is different to them, Gender, colour, religion, then it is usually because the aggressor has stereotyped that aspect and has justified their negative attitude, or wrong/aggressive/abusive behaviour towards all people with this.
I am in my 40's, there were areas of the world that as a white woman you could go alone, without the real threat of being raped and no-one coming to help, I have known instances of my friends being dragged off the street in Greece and Turkey and raped, whilst every local ignored this (this was in the 80's).
The attitude by some men that White (or Black) girls are just for fucking, still exists. This was because it was thought that all white women went in holiday to find sex and as we were happy to have sex outside if marriage, how date we get to deny some men.
The attitude that all Muslims are fair game for violent acts exists, as another example, but it could be the football shirt that you are wearing.
You are in greater danger if you are reduced to the colour if your skin etc, for example.
There have been experiments done that have proven that we lose Empathy if we assume that a person has a trait that we are biased against and we become capable of behaviour that wouldn't be usual for us, usually more violent/ nastier etc.
It is important not to reduce fellow Human Beings into categories, as is done during Slavery, Holocausts, Exploitation situations etc. Africa and it's people seems so far removed from "us" that we blank out them starving to death, yet build Museums about Hitlers Death Camps, for example. We do this daily as Humans.
All Governments use this ability to bring in their policies.
If DC announced that 30% of the population will have benefit rights removed, we would question it, but categorise that into "under 25's" and it will slip through.