D0oin, I think you've misunderstood me. My post was directed to those like EssexGirl who (paraphrasing) said that she didn't see why she should train her child to be both unfrightened and cautious of dogs, partly because she didn't understand why she should bother and partly because she didn't own a dog.
I disagree with her and agree with lots of others on here who have said that dogs are a part of life that children should learn to cope with, like lots of other everyday things children see whilst out and about. I think it's important that children should be able to interact safely but also comfortably and happily with animals.
Children have the ability to be (and should be) simultaneously unfrightened and cautious of lots of things, I think that it forms an understanding of two way respect and that certainly isn't just applicable to dogs.
I think it's a life skill all children need: to be able to be aware that something has the ability to cause you harm, but if that you are safe and respectful and polite, you're much less likely to be harmed.
That's why I disagree with Essex, because children need to be taught how to be safe and respectful and polite, alongside being taught that doing certain things can be dangerous, or how will they ever cope with the situation presented to them?
By teaching kids only half of being mutually respectful, you either end up with a bold, rude child who is comfortable running up to and disturbing dogs inappropriately, or contrarily a child who is very fearful of dogs, with that fear then impacting them day-to-day whenever they may see a dog.
The aim of me teaching mutual respect to my child is that if they see a dog that they would like to stroke, they will be comfortable enough to approach the owner to ask to do so. And if they are turned away with "I'm sorry, he's not very friendly", they will have the confidence to walk away safely because they know they minimised themselves being put at risk by 1. asking and 2. moving away from the animal safely and calmly without distressing it. And hey, if the owner says yes, they get to pat the nice doggy and then move on.
I'm not sure why you thought I was recommending children be thrown under the feet of dogs without thought for it or its owner, I was vouching for the mutual respect and politeness that you thought I was disagreeing with.
Sorry Essex if it seems like I'm singling you out, I just had to highlight some of your points for D0oin to understand what I'm prattling on about!
I hope my original post wasn't too confusing, and I hope that's cleared it up. Sorry for going on, I just wanted to make my stance clear. I don't own a dog, but I do love them to bits.