Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Jeremy Forrest verdict - aibu to be confused?

999 replies

noddyboulder · 20/06/2013 14:54

Yep, I don't think even his own parents could deny he's a massive, hideous scumbag with no impulse control - but how can he have been found guilty of abduction when the girl he had an affair with said it was her idea to go to France and she went willingly?

Can somebody legal shed some light?

OP posts:
DownstairsMixUp · 21/06/2013 13:00

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

SauvignonBlanche · 21/06/2013 13:01

5.5 years Hmm

cantspel · 21/06/2013 13:01

and Hall gets 18 months

Remotecontrolduck · 21/06/2013 13:01

5 1/2 years!

DownstairsMixUp · 21/06/2013 13:01

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

SomeDizzyWhore1804 · 21/06/2013 13:03

Oh well it's not as long as I would have hoped but it might make someone else think twice.

flippinada · 21/06/2013 13:03

I thought he'd get around that. It's better than I feared.

cantspel · 21/06/2013 13:04

I know my view wont be popular but i think 5 and a half years is excessive and a waste of public money

DownstairsMixUp · 21/06/2013 13:05

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

SauvignonBlanche · 21/06/2013 13:06

On the BBC just now, "the school where the love affair started..."
'love affair' FFS, how about child abuse? Angry

Catlike · 21/06/2013 13:06

It would be a complete waste of public money to keep him in prison for 7 years.

That would be the maximum sentence - he would actually have served less than 3 years due to time spent on remand. I would not have considered that a waste of public money in the slightest.

As it is, he'll serve just over 2 years. Is that a light enough punishment for you?

imnotmymum · 21/06/2013 13:07

Sort of agree cantspel. As I said I do have a 15 DD and would be more than crazy if this happened but 15 year old girls can be determined and know what they want and you sometimes cannot help who you fall in love with

DownstairsMixUp · 21/06/2013 13:07

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

StuntGirl · 21/06/2013 13:07

I think jail sentences like that send out the strict message that if you do break these laws and you do breach your position of trust that the law will not look kindly on it.

I hope his ex wife and his victim can use these 3 years (lets face it, he won't serve the full 5) to heal and move on.

StuntGirl · 21/06/2013 13:08

No but adults can. That's why the responsibilty lies with him, the abuser, not her.

mignonette · 21/06/2013 13:08

The ban and the message is the most important.

Sadly I have become aware of a teacher who watches porn that is a simulation of spying on young teenage girls showering in a school changing room. There is no legislation against this but he teaches teenage girls and clearly enjoys fantasising about naked school girls in a shower.

What to do? This is not so clear and plenty of people enjoy porn/sexual fantasies that others would recoil from. Yet it is not legal....This teacher has not come to my attention via my work/professional arena. I am not breaching any confidentiality by posting here.

flippinada · 21/06/2013 13:09

Yes, love affair seems somewhat inappropriate but then it's the BBC, and we know what was going on there so perhaps not surprising in that context.

Catlike · 21/06/2013 13:09

15 year old girls can be determined and know what they want and you sometimes cannot help who you fall in love with

That's why they need protecting from themselves or rather, predatory older men.

Maryz · 21/06/2013 13:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DownstairsMixUp · 21/06/2013 13:10

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

mignonette · 21/06/2013 13:10

I meant to say 'it is not illegal'

SomeDizzyWhore1804 · 21/06/2013 13:10

interesting article from the BBC

Bobyan · 21/06/2013 13:13

I hope she isn't allowed any contact with him for her own protection.

Maryz · 21/06/2013 13:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

imnotmymum · 21/06/2013 13:13

Oh agree should have left job and done things more correctly I am not saying that for one minute. I just do not think he is a predatory old man.