Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To think the Duchess of Cambridge has no place in sports personality of the year

400 replies

Nishky · 16/12/2012 22:41

Martina Navratilova made a moving speech about female role models so who do they roll out to present it?

OP posts:
LittleFrieda · 19/12/2012 10:58

auntmargaret "Does anyone else think that Wiggo's wife was devastated that he didn't thank her in his speech? I thought she looked like she was going to cry."

Yes! I thought the same.

Toughasoldboots · 19/12/2012 11:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Yellowtip · 19/12/2012 11:10

Cat I thought my reply last night counted.

Yellowtip · 19/12/2012 11:12

Kate happens to be a woman. I'd take the same approach if she was a man. I have deep reservations about Charles. He's a man. The thread concerns Kate Confused. This woman/ man stuff is silly, and designed to deflect.

Toughasoldboots · 19/12/2012 11:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MordionAgenos · 19/12/2012 11:15

I'm not the one who doesn't want the status quo upset, love. Grin I'm the republican, not the cap doffing royalist.

Toughasoldboots · 19/12/2012 11:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Toughasoldboots · 19/12/2012 11:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LtXmasEve · 19/12/2012 11:23

your status quo, love. That's what I said. You want to believe that the Princes are 'thick', so it doesn't matter what I say. You are quick to dismiss, because you are happy to believe they are thick. It doesnt really matter (although resorting to PA insults does rather call the definition of 'thick' into question)

I don't 'cap-doff' by the way. I salute.

MordionAgenos · 19/12/2012 11:25

All that having said, despite being a republican I don't actually mind Kate. Grin

Toughasoldboots · 19/12/2012 11:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MordionAgenos · 19/12/2012 11:28

It doesn't matter what you say except that with every post you dig yourself a little deeper. The princes are thick and your saying they aren't doesn't make a damn of difference.

LtXmasEve · 19/12/2012 11:36

No I'm saying that if they were thick the wouldn't have been able to pass a full year of very technical and demanding exams. A full year of intensive classroom teaching - a degree course that is crammed into 12 months instead of 36 months.

Followed, only then, by practical flying training and experience.

A course of instruction that 100s of people fail every year. A course that very quickly weeds out those who would find it difficult, and the 'fly boys' who are doing it for less than honourable reasons. I have known people to fail on the dry first day Smile

I know the people that teach the courses. I used to administer those people, and the trainees taking the course. I know how hard it is, and I know that they wouldn't have been able to pass if they had been thick.

But like you said. It doesn't matter.

MordionAgenos · 19/12/2012 11:37

And there you have it. Grin

Yellowtip · 19/12/2012 11:46

LtEve have you come across the phrase discretion is the better part of valour?

LtXmasEve · 19/12/2012 11:53

Yes, why?

kim147 · 19/12/2012 11:57

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EldritchCleavage · 19/12/2012 12:02

I simply don't understand the degree of rattiness now being displayed on this thread. Is there some convoluted backstory? Someone please PM with it if so.

LtXmasEve · 19/12/2012 12:04

Yes they must have Kim Smile. Most Officer Cadets have been to Uni (some are sponsored) but some are taken after A Levels. There is a lot of 'on the job' training though. Many hoops to jum

Yellowtip · 19/12/2012 12:06

The only backstory I can think of is that LtEve seemed to take exception to my take on the anachronistic attitude displayed on my watch to army wives, but the rattiness seems disproportionate for sure.

LtXmasEve · 19/12/2012 12:09

Oops, 'hoops to jump through' of course Smile

Eldrich, no backstory do to speak, other than some posters have a vehement dislike of the Royal Family, and some don't. Yellowtip and I have disagreed before, both on the Royal Family and on my knowledge of the British Army. I like to explain things Smile

Yellowtip · 19/12/2012 12:09

I think the minimum requirement these days is a strong 2.1 from a Russell Group or 1994 uni in a 'solid' subject. I think the army issues a list. The Shrivenham List. Or Informed Choices. Anyhow something like that.

LtXmasEve · 19/12/2012 12:17

RMAS Sandhurst

Defence Academy

These may help Kim.

CatWithKittens · 19/12/2012 12:18

Toughasoldboots - I take your answer to be an admission of nothing useful done. Yet they do say that if oyu want anything done you shoudl ask a busy person.

Yellowtip - anyone can make assertions. I was hoping for some evidence. In any event senior Royals do far more than 100 days a year - even in their 80s and 90s judging by the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh.

Yellowtip · 19/12/2012 12:33

Cat you asked, I answered. I can't possibly give details of any community service thing that I do, it would be entirely inappropriate. I thinkthe poster who calculated the hours spent on engagments was working in full working days, not part of. So I do vastly in excess of a tenth of that. And enjoy it and find it extremely interesting too. But I'm not going to out myself, sorry.

Swipe left for the next trending thread