Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Censorship and DD3's teacher... AIBU?

470 replies

NoNoNora · 06/10/2012 20:12

Yesterday evening DD3's teacher called to voice her concerns about how appropriate the programmes we let her watch are. DD3 is ten and for all four DDs we haven't paid any attention to ratings, they'll watch what we watch and we won't question what they want to watch during their TV time (unless a fight breaks out between them), none of them are at all traumatised or have nightmares and they always voice their fears and/or leave the room if something is too much for them.
The latest craze at DD3's school is top trump cards and she took DD2's Buffy ones in last week (DD2 is at uni so DD3 has the run of her bedroom and belongings). As a family we all watch Buffy together and have done since it first started, we own the DVDs and the girls have grown up watching it. Of course there are things that the younger ones don't pick up on (i.e. much of the sixth season) but DP and I feel that it is a very positive programme for our girls to watch.
DD3's teacher did not agree with our view. She confiscated the cards for the day on Friday and then called me that evening. Apparently she was concerned that our older girls had been showing 'innapropriate' programmes to the younger ones. I explained that we watched Buffy as a family and I had given her permission to take the cards into school. She then proceeded to explain the importance to ratings and the problems with 'desensitising' children to violence and sex. I was flabbergasted and promised not to let DD3 take the cards into school again but maintained that I was doing nothing wrong in my parenting.

I can't be the only mum who thinks like this? DP is incredibly anti-censorship and wants to send her in with DD2's much more graphic 'Angel' cards on Monday, with a note to the (and I quote) "fascists".

OP posts:
QuintessentialShadows · 06/10/2012 22:23

As a parent you need to learn to say "no" and explain why something is not appropriate.

Are you the same poster who got a hump and wanted to complain to the head that your dd was told to do something, and when she didnt do as teacher instructed but did her own thing instead was told off and started crying (tantrum)?

Letting your children decide everything while you just meekly follow their lead, is both lazy and unintelligent parenting. Rod for your own back.

HelenMumsnet · 06/10/2012 22:24

Evening. Thanks for all the reports about this thread.

We have no reason right now to think the OP is anything other than genuine.

We appreciate that feelings are running high - but please can we remind you that personal attacks are against our Talk Guidelines.

waltermittymissus · 06/10/2012 22:27

Why on earth was my post deleted????

Showing porn IS child abuse. It's used to groom children.

I cannot believe that HQ would delete that. Are you worried OP's feelings will be hurt? Perhaps you should be more concerned about people like her thinking that this is acceptable parenting.

MadgeHarvey · 06/10/2012 22:28

Goodness. What a lot of deletions on this thread. Not that that leaves a lingering smell of something odd in the air.........oh no..........

HelenMumsnet · 06/10/2012 22:28

@waltermittymissus

Why on earth was my post deleted????

Showing porn IS child abuse. It's used to groom children.

I cannot believe that HQ would delete that. Are you worried OP's feelings will be hurt? Perhaps you should be more concerned about people like her thinking that this is acceptable parenting.

Because you said this thread was a wind-up - implying the OP is a troll. Trollhunting is against our guidelines, too.

You're welcome to repost that post without that last sentence.

MadgeHarvey · 06/10/2012 22:28

I'd like to know the same about mine walter - but I suppose it'll remain a mystery. Another among many.

HelenMumsnet · 06/10/2012 22:29

@MadgeHarvey

I'd like to know the same about mine walter - but I suppose it'll remain a mystery. Another among many.

You made a personal attack on the OP, Madge.

MadgeHarvey · 06/10/2012 22:31

I did? I thought I made an attack on the OP's reasoning. Do forgive me. I think I'll go play nice by myself somewhere! Grin

Fairenuff · 06/10/2012 22:31

Has the op asked for the thread to be censored? Shock Grin

lisad123 · 06/10/2012 22:34

Why were mine deleted?? She is abusive, I spent enough time with SS to know that much

HelenMumsnet · 06/10/2012 22:34

@MadgeHarvey

I did? I thought I made an attack on the OP's reasoning. Do forgive me. I think I'll go play nice by myself somewhere! Grin
Grin
waltermittymissus · 06/10/2012 22:35

I actually didn't mean that OP was a troll.

It was just bad wording for "I can't believe somebody actually thinks this is acceptable". Sorry!

HelenMumsnet · 06/10/2012 22:35

@lisad123

Why were mine deleted?? She is abusive, I spent enough time with SS to know that much

That part of your post was fine, lisa123, but you started it with a personal attack.

HelenMumsnet · 06/10/2012 22:36

@waltermittymissus

I actually didn't mean that OP was a troll.

It was just bad wording for "I can't believe somebody actually thinks this is acceptable". Sorry!

OK. Can see what you mean. We have had reports from people concerned that the OP is a troll, though, so we hope you can understand that your post was easily taken the other way.

pictish · 06/10/2012 22:36

i don't think letting a 10 yr old watch Buffy is abusive. Calm down.
The Op's ideology is questionable, but she hasn't abused her child. Stop saying she has.

HelenMumsnet · 06/10/2012 22:37

@Fairenuff

Has the op asked for the thread to be censored? Shock Grin

No, actually.

Which does make her very consistent. Wink

lisad123 · 06/10/2012 22:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

pictish · 06/10/2012 22:38

I've been deleted for less....

pictish · 06/10/2012 22:38

Or in other words - no.

HelenMumsnet · 06/10/2012 22:38

No!

But you can say that you think her decisions are idiotic.

Don't attack the poster; but you can attack her opinions.

waltermittymissus · 06/10/2012 22:38

HQ I can understand! It was a bad choice of words. :)

pictish we're not referring to Buffy.

TidyGOLDDancer · 06/10/2012 22:38

Pictish, you may wish to read through some of the other posts before telling people to calm down. The OP's attitude is extremely worrying.

BasicallySFB · 06/10/2012 22:38

Grin Helen! I thought MNHQ were all neutral an that :)

lisad123 · 06/10/2012 22:40

Ok her ideas and decisions are idiotic and could be classed as abusive.
She is showing children 18 rated movies which may contain violent or sexual content which under CP rules is an abusive situation.

MyCatHasStaff · 06/10/2012 22:41

But we have discussed why the cards were confiscated and why she will only be taking in her Harry Potter ones on Monday so as not to scare the other children.
So basically you've explained that your children are superior to their classmates, and it's ok to patronise and talk down to other children, but not your own. Nice.
I can tell you from my own experience that when you read what children write in class, and observe their behaviour with their peers, you can tell which ones have no boundaries at home in what they watch or games they play because their perspectives are askew.
People like me (and many others who have posted here) deal with the fallout from your poor parenting because you refuse to see the damage your inability to take responsibility does not only to your own children, but to the others around them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread