Oh dear, I almost feel sorry for Tesco's - what a thread.
However, I had a run-in at Tesco myself today. They appeared to be getting rid of YET MORE of their staffed checkouts. Saw two managers (regional and local I think) talking together and asked re the disappearing staffed checkouts and said how I think the unstaffed ones are rubbish.
I was told the disappearance of the staffed checkouts was temporary, and (flannel, flannel) that people LIKE the unmanned checkouts; eighty per cent of customers use them, I was told. Should have pointed out that you are practically FORCED to use them after 5.30 pm because the staffed checkouts then, except for one, are shut down. But I DID say that making customers pay their money over to machines rather than people, was putting people out of work; it is disgusting.
Mr Senior manager said Tesco wasn't putting people out of work; they were taking on a further 20,000 staff or something. I said, are you talking about the poor sods taken on as 'interns' and working for nothing? Was told it's not like that; 80 per cent of people working for their unemployment benefit at Tesco DO get given a job.
SO ANNOYING when you are very very cross and you realise afterwards you forgot to say something important...
I should have said, if this is so, - who pays the unemployment benefit of the unpaid interns while they're working for Tesco? Taxpayers - or Tesco? And, if it's true that eighty per cent of them get offered a job - how long is it before that happens?
At a pinch I could see that it could be sort-of OK if they were expected to work unpaid for a month, max., to see how they do.
But any more - and I BET it is, - and, Tesco, you're 'aving a larf.