Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to be a bit shocked at some of the reactions to CB cuts on MN?

122 replies

kickmewhenimdown · 23/03/2012 15:45

Yes, it will be a bit crappy to lose CB but some of the suggestions/views by some mners are imo no better than people who fiddle tax credits?

OP posts:
DeepThought · 23/03/2012 16:13

eh?

2shoes · 23/03/2012 16:17

your not wrong, huge sense of entitlement and hypocrisy

CrystalMaize · 23/03/2012 16:17

Can you give an example OP?

caramelwaffle · 23/03/2012 16:17

Your OP is not clear: would you rephrase it.

Moominsarescary · 23/03/2012 16:18

Yes and you will probably see some of them on threads complaining about benefit cheats

buttonmoon78 · 23/03/2012 16:18

A thread about a/some thread/s...

FoofFighter · 23/03/2012 16:19

Bit more shocked at yet another thread that could have been posted on the many original threads!

Moominsarescary · 23/03/2012 16:19

Example

Can my exp claime as I am no longer entitled.

Can I refuse to give them information about dh's earnings

lostboysfallin · 23/03/2012 16:28

It's completely different
People are having a long standing perfectly legitimate benefit taken off them, in some cases unfairly.
Its a very poorly thought out policy, and children will lose out

You can't blame people for trying to find a way around it

Hulababy · 23/03/2012 16:31

I will no longer be eligible to claim as DH earns a fair bit above the threshold. TBF our household shouldn't be getting benefits, there are far more people in this country who needs it way more.

2shoes · 23/03/2012 16:36

they will still be benefit cheats though, however you dress it up.

Anonymumous · 23/03/2012 16:37

It's not different really though, is it? What does "long standing perfectly legitimate benefit" mean, anyway? If the government decides you're no longer entitled to it, that's that surely - it's no longer legitimate to go on claiming it, and it's certainly not legitimate to lie about your circumstances to try to keep claiming it anyway. Shock

Not sure how much a child in a family with at least one income of over £60,000 a year can be said to be 'losing out' either, TBH...

bemybebe · 23/03/2012 16:39

CB should be completely abolished though.

emma123456 · 23/03/2012 16:43

agree CB should be abolished completely. Use the universal credit to replace CB.
To be honest, if you can't afford a child, dont have one.

usualsuspect · 23/03/2012 16:45

What if you have a child and then lose your job? ...oh never mind cfba

CointreauVersial · 23/03/2012 16:49

Well, I shall miss my £2500. It's true we have a decent income and don't "need" it, but I'll notice when it has gone.

But I wouldn't dream of hiding information/lying just so I could keep it.

EdithWeston · 23/03/2012 16:52

'Can I refuse to give them information about dh's earnings? '

This strikes at the heart of the principle of independent taxation. At present, one individual cannot compel anther to reveal details on income. Financial independence for women has been a long and hard battle. A Government can of course rescind any part of tax law or practice that it wishes.

But chucking out this principle with so little acknowledgement or debate is just wrong. This question about refusal is both important and telling.

OutragedAtThePriceOfFreddos · 23/03/2012 16:59

If people can retain their CB through legal measures, good luck to them.

Wamster · 23/03/2012 16:59

EdithWeston, but this principle has been 'chucked out' for a long, long time. I don't understand your comment -which seems to be saying that it is only being chucked out now.
Everybody who claims a means-tested benefit who lives with a partner is asked to provide details about their partner's income. It's not a new thing, is it? Or am I missing something here.

Refusing to give information is, of course, fine, but then the claim won't be processed and no benefit claimed.

I do think that it is wrong to tax people as individuals but treat them as households when it comes to benefits, I agree 100%, but it's not new (?)

EdithWeston · 23/03/2012 17:08

That is not the chucking out of this principle.

That us making a joint claim for the household, with consent of both and aggregating the income of both.

This is not remotely the same thing. It could be (and IMHO would be a better thing) if it were. Not least as it would eliminate the unfair "step" it introduces (all households on joint income of £60 k to lee it, not just some).

But what is proposed is for individual A to have to disclose aspects of the financial situation of person B. This is the breach of the hard won principle.

towedornot · 23/03/2012 17:10

but surely it is new to those earning over £60k as they will not previously have been claiming any benefits such as child tax credits where household income is required.

Wamster · 23/03/2012 17:12

Ah, I see.

kickmewhenimdown · 23/03/2012 17:12

I was a low earner :( and was a single parent to one ds. When my dp moved in (he was obviously a step parent to my ds) I lost all my ctc/wtc which was essentially about half his wage at that time. He obviously had to more or less take over financially running our home and being financially responsible for a child that was not his. If I had came on here at that time and asked if i was being unreasonable not declaring his income etc Im pretty sure i would have been flamed, and rightly so.

OP posts:
Whatmeworry · 23/03/2012 17:13

A fred about lots of freds. What is the point here?

kickmewhenimdown · 23/03/2012 17:13

And I need to add that the both us dont make nowhere near £60 between us.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread