I would like to give an example from the feminist section today.
There was a conversation about rape cases and how the police handle them. The case of John Warboys came up (I am sure most people have heard of him, the black cab rapist).
Anyway. In the course of the conversation the case of John Warboys was raised as an example of where things were not good with the police, and in the context of that conversation he was described as a serial rapist.
The reponse came back "John Warboys was allegedly one of the most prolific serial rapists in UK, he was convicted of just one rape."
Now, why would someone come onto MN, and make that comment? Why? It seems, odd, to say the least.
And that sort of backdrop is the sort of thing that goes on all the time in the feminist topic. And when people lose their argument there, they tend to have a big flounce and a rant about how horrible MN feminists are.
Well whatever, really. Women have been stopped from posting on MN by this sort of thing and targetted attacks - like internet stalking I guess - and it is a real shame.
Anyway.
The OP was really horrible on a thread in another topic. So. Bye.