Quote from above :-
The following type of thinking (sorry not picking on just this poster, others said similar things) ...
^I have just bought a lampshade for DD's room. The boys each have a lampshade with boats on it. I've bought the same one for DD - and avoided the frankly pathetic 'cupcake' / 'fairy' / 'flower princess' versions labelled 'FOR GIRLS' Why on earth should a girl not like boats? Yet the shop assistant was rather surprised/critical.
So why didn't you buy them all lampshades with flowers on them? Why is it the 'girl' that has to 'compromise'??
ANSWER
ChippingIn - thanks for your comment, and I don't feel picked on, quite glad you asked actually, because it's an important point.
The reason I got boats for all of them is that I think boats are more interesting than flowers or cakes. The main objection I have to the ultra-girly stuff is that I think the themes and colours are boring. Obviously that's just my view.
As a matter of fact, DS2 has a flowery pillowcase (because he likes it) and also has all the pink cuddly toys that people gave us for DD lined up in his cot (she is too young to be interested in toys yet). And DS1 is about to start ballet lessons because he asked if he could.
So I am absolutely not against boys having/doing traditionally 'girly' things, and would be equally cross at anyone stereotyping them. I think part of the problem with the idea that boys and girls must have only specifically 'boy' or 'girl' things is that it limits their own thinking before they are old enough to develop genuine preferences.
When DD is old enough to have a preference (she is 7 months) then I will let her choose, as I let the boys choose now. But I will try to make sure that she doesn't feel railroaded into only choosing from a limited selection labelled PINK and FLUFFY for GIRLS (just as I don't force the boys to choose from KHAKI TOUGH STUFF for BOYS).
And I do expect them to share a lot of stuff, which will be a mixture of colours. (pink will be one of them)