Does this mean that whenever a woman, or anyone adult, cries its because they havent got their own way? Or could it mean that they are feeling hurt, upset, genuinely distressed?
Context matters. If somebody doesn't feel inclined to include one of your traditions, a tradition incidentally your own children don't even remember, let alone treasure, do you burst into tears all over your son, or do you typically keep a certain degree of self control even if really put out, cross or hurt ?
Tears are an over reaction in these circs IMO, (possibly becuase I tend not to leak all over people unless we are talking about serious, important upsets).
So perhaps the OP is not too far out in her assessment that they were more a tool of manipulation than genuine distress.
Some DILs are horrible to their MILs cos they enjoy a good persecution complex, some MILS are addicted to the drama of constantly creating scenes based on strong arming their DILs into setting and maintaining boundries.
If the DIL over reacted by knocking back the gift, then how is floods of tears in response not an even greater over reaction ?
If the DIL should just gracefully accepted the offer of gifts, should the MIL not also be held to the principle of gracefully accepting (sans tears) that not all her traditions have a place in the next generations recreation of family traditions ?