Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

AIBU to wonder why any woman would identify herself as [2]

1007 replies

garlicnutter · 04/07/2011 15:37

... not a feminist?

Since I killed the old one.

OP posts:
swallowedAfly · 06/07/2011 13:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Hullygully · 06/07/2011 13:09

hopeless opeless hopeless

Why will no one address the actual sodding issue?

Carminagetsprimal · 06/07/2011 13:09

SAF; I'll go and have a look in education, if there isn't one it wound be great to get one going.

(( apologise for posting totally off topic today - ))

swallowedAfly · 06/07/2011 13:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

swallowedAfly · 06/07/2011 13:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Prolesworth · 06/07/2011 13:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Omigawd · 06/07/2011 13:14

In the hope of sowing peace with another OTT Manifesto, here is my starter for 10 what I thought "little F" feminism should be about:

  1. I like boys and men on the whole, and I just don't buy that men are all bastards and rapists, or that even a majority are. And lets admit it - some women are also conniving, controlling bitches - so the automatic presumption that "men are wrong" is itself wrong. Each case needs to be treated on its merit.
  2. I want equality,not preference....as far as we practically can, as my experience with DCs tells me there are real physiological, developmental and psychological differences between the sexes no matter what some up in the clouds academic claims
  3. A person is presumed innocent until proven guilty under law, even if it is a rape case.
  4. Wanting to look good an wear nice stuff is for me dammit, it's not throwing away my principles to the patriarchy.
  5. I will read what I bloody well like, listen to what I want to, go where I want and do what I want to do, and no one - patriarchy, PR people or patronising feministas - have the right to shout me down.
  6. I want moderation and inclusivity in my feminism, not extremism and "my way is the only way". Anyone who plays the controlling/vituperative/I'm right/etc card on MN is not a "real" feminist, they are just another type of narrow minded extremist.
  7. I want feminism to pressure for things that matter to the majority of sensible women who just want to bring up their families in peace and security, not for causes that impact a tiny % of misfits women.
  8. I want my feminism to be big enough to admit it has made mistakes in the last 30 years
  9. Freedom of Speech rules, and that includes stuff we may not like - porn, people who disagree with us, etc - and I can't keep up with hate the whole PC game
10. I'm proud of what women have achieved in the last 100 years - and the ones who did the great things were going after the big ideas, not petty shots. We need to carry that torch.

There - and damn the torpedoes........

lenak · 06/07/2011 13:15

?I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.?

(Quote from Robert McCloskey - author of Make Way for Ducklings) - Just about sums up how I feel about the way some of my contributions to this thread have been taken.

I will re-iterate once more that I do not self-identify as a feminist because of genuine reasons within my philosophical stance which I do not feel are compatible with calling myself a feminist. I do not frame my views on inequality through a gendered oriented lense, I do not believe that quotas are the way to achieving equality and I do not feel equality can be achieved if it is framed through a reference of righting past wrongs.

While these things form part of my own personal philosophy, it would be disengenious to both myself and to Feminism to claim to be a feminist because these are fundamental differences - therefore I don't. However, none of that means that I do not want equality, nor does it mean that I do not recognise that women still get a raw deal, no matter how many times radical feminists tell me it does.

I use the term equalist or egalitarian because at the moment, they seem to fit most comfortably with my personal philosophy although I don't agree with every aspect of it. I would prefer not to use labels at all, but recognise that they are a useful shorthand for identifying positions, and until something better comes along, for me, equalist or egalitarian is it.

That does not make me an MRA (I had never even heard the term until this thread), it does not make me a misogynist, it does not make me an 'anti-feminist'. MRA's may also call themselves equalists, just as some man haters call themselves feminists. It does not mean that everyone who uses the label shares the views of those on the extreme fringes. This is something which Feminists were keen to argue earlier in the thread when people were saying they didn't like feminism because of the radical elements, but seem unwilling to accept about those who call themselves equalists.

There are a lot of equality issues in which I share feminist concerns - of particular and personal interest to me is women's role in child-rearing and the workplace - it is just that I may have different ideas and approaches to how these could best be tackled. In the end, I think we are all striving for the same outcome.

I would love to be able to discuss it on the feminist boards as I believe that by using a combination of approaches, the end goal could be reached much quicker. However, I don't because as soon as it becomes apparent that I am not standing up and shouting proudly from the rooftops that I am a feminist, I would get insulted.

Claig proved that earlier up the thread when despite several attempts by me to explain my position she continued to harrangue my views, equating them with MRA's and ending with the wonderfully patronising:

"It doesn't sound like you are really interested in equality. The feminism board is probably not for you. I reckon the MRA's website is more your home."

I have also, in the past been called an anti-feminist by Dittany for expressing similar views.

What chance would I have of being able to engage in any kind of reasonable discussion on the feminist boards when self-declared feminists themselves are called Misogynists for not liking Sarah Palin?

However, it has become increasingly clear that some MN feminists do not want to hear these views or take on board the criticisms (Lenin has been a refreshing exception). It seems to me people would prefer to continue to throw around accusations of trolling or bullying or assume that the differences and criticisms are the result of some kind of successful mind control games by MRA?s rather than any behaviour on their own part or the ability of people to make up their own minds about things. Even when it is acknowledged that there may be issues with attitudes or behaviours of certain individuals (and no Dittany, I am not talking specifically about you), excuses are just trotted out about how it is because the feminist boards are trolled and the feminist posters on them have to constantly defend themselves ? no matter that the people they are attacking are not the trolls. It?s like being shot at by a sniper in a crowded market and spraying the whole market in machine gun fire in retaliation.

Surely it would be more productive to work out how things can move forward and those of us with common interests and opinions around gender equality can actually work together to facilitate change more quickly.

Those saying that the MRA?s are probably patting themselves on the back for the dischord that has been created are most likely right ? and the ironic thing is, in the case of this thread, the MRA?s didn?t even have to lift a finger to facilitate it. They just got to sit back and watch as intelligent women with strong opinions decided to tear each other to shreds rather than listening and finding common ground.

MillyR · 06/07/2011 13:15

I find it almost impossible to distinguish between the two sides of the argument in this thread - but that's politics for you. Whoever you vote for, the Government still gets in. There are people on both sides who have said rude things, caused others distress, brought up stuff from previous threads and so on.

The idea that Dittany is some kind of dominant force on the feminist section is a delusion. Even if some of you do use this thread to oust her, and you go on to believe that either Carmina and GN run the section, or Hully and Lenin run the section, everybody else in feminism will continue not to care about your power struggles and post as we always have done according to what we think - and will ignore the squabbles and ideas that the feminist section is some sort of popularity contest/exercise in controlling what the masses think/campaign for political office.

This whole thing is incredibly childish.

AliceWhirledSupportsTheStrike · 06/07/2011 13:15

I can't keep up with this either, but what I have seen has been foul. Singling people out and attacking them is foul. Totally agree with what Proles has said. Pulling stuff out over here and using it as a way of personally attacking is nasty, nasty stuff.

Hullygully · 06/07/2011 13:15

wotevver

lemonmuffin · 06/07/2011 13:16

there are no personal attacks prolesworth, if there were mumsnet would have deleted them by now and there have been surprisingly few deletions on both these threads (which i think says a lot really)

People are just making some very valid points about certain behaviours on the feminism section

UsingMainlySpoons · 06/07/2011 13:16

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Hullygully · 06/07/2011 13:16

Alice - Unlike what went on on the chat thread of course.

Oh no, that was just me being rude and aggressive. tut.

Pagwatch · 06/07/2011 13:17

Okay

Prolesworth.
I agree with the idea of putting up with it when your views are challenged. Fair enough.
But you slightly ignore the context.
As the sn section has been used as an example..
If someone turns up on sn, new to sn but maybe with a child with sn issues. And he/she has a question or comment that to me, with my 15 years of experience with sn, sounds crass or naive or even faintly stupid, is my correct response to challenge them and point out how stupid their question is and make them feel unwelcome. or to discuss it with them in a way that makes them feel ok and curious and engaged?

The former would create a little sn heaven, all us posters knowing as much as we do holding all that combined knowledge and reading and resources and no one to ask fucking stupid questions or go over the ground that we collectively went over five years ago.
Would that be great. Would those new posters just need to get with the programe or fuck off?

It's back to the question I asked before, do we just fundamentally all have different views of the purpose of this board?

swallowedAfly · 06/07/2011 13:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Prolesworth · 06/07/2011 13:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

swallowedAfly · 06/07/2011 13:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Hullygully · 06/07/2011 13:18

And was that dear Proles? Why was that? Or shall we ignore the context and just throw accusations again?

Plus ca change

garlicnutter · 06/07/2011 13:19

Good point at 11 13:15, Milly.
Taken in.
Thanks.

OP posts:
DontCallMePeanut · 06/07/2011 13:19

sighs

Right, here goes.

Just because someone doesn't agree with your views does not make them a misogynist, a rape apologist, a domestic violence accuser, or a complete fuckwit. (I'm pretty sure I've just been accussed of being one, by stealth...)

Sometimes, we have newbies in the feminist section, who are still completely new to the concept. Therefore, some of their views are different, and in some cases influenced heavily by a patriachal society. Is jumping on them and insulting them the way to go? That's just going to put the newbies off, and leave us chasing our tails... "We're not bullies, but fuck you if you come in with the wrong views..."

Sometimes, we get the feminists locking horns. It seems a feminist with a son and a feminist with a daughter will have different views. That doesn't mean either is wrong, necessarily. Sometimes a working class and a middle class feminist will have opposing views. It doesn't mean either is wrong. It just means they have different experiences.

Y'know, if we stop being so damn insulting to each other, it might actually make the whole Feminist section look less daunting, less far fetched and more appealling. Instead, we're just making ourselves look childish and pretty damn scary.

swallowedAfly · 06/07/2011 13:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

lemonmuffin · 06/07/2011 13:19

Pity party is a semi jokey term, it seemed fairly apt in the circumstances from what i could see.

Pagwatch · 06/07/2011 13:20
lemonmuffin · 06/07/2011 13:21

"Y'know, if we stop being so damn insulting to each other, it might actually make the whole Feminist section look less daunting, less far fetched and more appealling. Instead, we're just making ourselves look childish and pretty damn scary."

Absolutely Peanut, thats what Lenin has been trying to do. And look how she's been treated for it.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.