Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be a fan of the Oxford comma?

140 replies

MrMan · 01/07/2011 22:05

Sentences just seem so wrong otherwise.

OP posts:
prettybird · 04/07/2011 15:39

I too would normally try to re-write to avoid confusion - but sometimes you choose not to do so because, for example, it would spoil the cadence of the overall paragraph. That's why I said judicious use .

There are occasions when it required to ensure that there was no ambiguity. For example, what split should be given to the heirs according to this bequest: I leave all my property in equal shares to Jim, Helen, Tim and Eva. ?

If Tim and Eva were a couple (or even if they weren't), does that mean that the property should be split into thirds, with Tim and Eva between them receiving a third?

If it were written I leave all my property in equal shares to Jim, Helen, Tim, and Eva. it makes it clear that each should receive 25%.

TrillianAstra · 04/07/2011 15:41

cadence

Exactly.

BelfastBloke · 04/07/2011 18:50

"I may even construct sentences specifically to make it necessary to use one."

Trills is cantankerous and ornery.

mathanxiety · 04/07/2011 20:03

'The duchess wore an electric blue Jacquenta dress by Erdem, the Canadian-born British designer who designed the dress on her arrival in Canada on Thursday.' Here's a terrible sentence from www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14005220 that is crying out for any old comma, let alone an Oxford one.

mathanxiety · 04/07/2011 20:03

Actually, there is more wrong with that sentence than just the lack of a comma. It needs complete reconstruction.

Strix · 04/07/2011 21:22

YANBU

The Oxford comma is essential to clear communication.

FellatioNelson · 04/07/2011 22:12

I've been looking at houses on the internet today and it's been really winding me up. They all say:

'Entrance hall has doors to: kitchen, WC, lounge and dining room.'

Does that mean the dining room can only be accessed through the lounge? Is it an open plan room? Or are there separate doors off the hall?

The Oxford comma would sort it all out for me.

GoblinMarket · 04/07/2011 22:58

no - it's just that a comma should never precede and Wink

FellatioNelson · 04/07/2011 23:01

Well it shouldn't, but only in certain types of sentence - not others!

GoblinMarket · 04/07/2011 23:04

I can see that your aforementioned example could almost be acceptable !! Smile

EightiesChick · 05/07/2011 00:13

Love, love the Oxford comma. Great thread!

TrillianAstra · 05/07/2011 08:48

Ornery is an interesting word.

Cantankerous just makes me sound OLD!

Insomnia11 · 05/07/2011 09:57

I don't use it in legal documents. If you need to use it it's probably because you need to think again how to better construct the sentence.

cumfy · 05/07/2011 11:48

Precisely Insomnia.
Syntax can't remedy semantics.

ShoutyHamster · 05/07/2011 12:44

Oxford comma great, Cambridge colon less so

(it's what you get after following their diet Grin)

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread