Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to ask if you agree with the teacher's strike upcoming

389 replies

AuntiePickleBottom · 22/06/2011 22:03

i am on the fence about it, due to not understanding pensions.

OP posts:
justonemorethen · 23/06/2011 22:58

What about the fact that you can buy a house through social housing "keyworker" schemes too. Another perk not available to the not so "key" workers in the private sector.

cricketballs · 23/06/2011 22:58

I never said that anyone can teach A level; you did!

mdowdall · 23/06/2011 22:59

cricketballs and twinklypearls I want to apologise to you both. If you are struggling to get on the housing ladder that must be a nightmare in itself given house prices. To clarify, I do think teachers get a reasonable wage for what they do however, the housing market in the UK is fucked, hence where an NQT used to be able to buy a house 15 years ago, that is no longer the case.

twinklypearls · 23/06/2011 23:00

I am aware that you can buy a house though the keyworker scheme, I do not know a single teacher who has used the scheme. I do not live in a city though.

cricketballs · 23/06/2011 23:01

but without that scheme justonemorethan you wouldn't get any teachers working in the areas with high housing costs; what would be the point?

twinklypearls · 23/06/2011 23:01

I agree that the housing market is a social evil.

trixymalixy · 23/06/2011 23:02

A dip, not a massive cut, nothing compared to the slaughter of private sector pensions. To achieve the equivalent of 1/2 my current salary, not my final salary on current projections I would have to up my pension contribution to 24% of my salary on top of the 8% my employer pays, and as talkipeace says there is no guarantee of even that, it could be wiped out in a Market crash.

Most employers pay nothing like that amount and the majority of private sector workers have NO pension whatsoever.

twinklypearls · 23/06/2011 23:03

As we have come to expect from this government it is a change that will affect women in particular.

TalkinPeace2 · 23/06/2011 23:04

keyworker scheme is dire
it was thought up by people who want to make money on property speculation, not to help key workers

as long as interest on business debt is tax deductible and interest on business (and private) savings is taxed, the economies of Britain, Europe, America and the rest of the world will never get out of the mess we are in

justonemorethen · 23/06/2011 23:04

Well I have 4 as neighbours. That's how I know you can have a year off on full pay!
I admire that you keeping your end up twinklypearls. You seem like a decent teacher as you haven't lost your temper once with the mob on here!

cricketballs · 23/06/2011 23:06

thank you mdowdall; I do agree (especially in the area I live) I get a reasonable wage as the majority of jobs here are low paid, manual, shop work etc so my salary does feel in par with my qualifications. I do however have the issue with paying more, working longer and getting less than I signed up for. As I stated earlier, all this proposal is going to do is cost a fortune in sickness pay as the majority of teachers will not be capable of performing a full time teaching role in their 60s (I am struggling now before I hit 40!)

Jonnyfan · 23/06/2011 23:06

She's a teacher- used to keeping her cool when provoked.

twinklypearls · 23/06/2011 23:06

I also know that I do not have the extra £83 a month that I will be asked for, I will have to withdraw from the pension scheme altogether.

twinklypearls · 23/06/2011 23:07

I keep my temper for a living. Grin

twinklypearls · 23/06/2011 23:08

I think that is an important point cricket, this will end up costing a fortune in sick pay.

trixymalixy · 23/06/2011 23:10

I would advise you to find that money from somewhere. Wish I had the option of paying just £83 extra a month for a reasonable standard of living instead of having to fond the extra hundreds I need.

justonemorethen · 23/06/2011 23:11

Just saying it's another perk of the job.

TalkinPeace2 · 23/06/2011 23:12

I agree with trixymalixy
a defined benefit scheme will ALWAYS be a better investment than a defined contribution scheme for the next 15 years or so of projected investment returns (ie dire)

TalkinPeace2 · 23/06/2011 23:13

Sick pay - do Academies have to stick to national agreements on that or can they restrict periods and then force people out - like businesses do?

twinklypearls · 23/06/2011 23:16

I already work a 15 hour day, when am I going to do a second job?

Sits back and waits for someone to suggest all my holidays.

trixymalixy · 23/06/2011 23:16

I think more options should be given to the teachers so that they could choose to keep their contributions the same for less pension or a later retirement, or pay more to maintain their current benefits. I think what Hutton said today is very sensible too, drastic changes will force people to leave the pension schemes and that is not a good thing.

cricketballs · 23/06/2011 23:17

talkin - not sure about that; the terms and conditions have been a major concern for all unions regarding academies

twinklypearls · 23/06/2011 23:18

I do think there is an issue with getting accurate information , which is why I changed union rather than strike.

According to the NUT pension calculator I am going to lose at least £162,000 of my pension - assuming 25 years of retirement. That is a loss of about £6,500 a year, I am not expecting a pension of £10,000 a year so am I only going to get a pension of £3K a year.

mdowdall · 23/06/2011 23:20

This whole thread is making me think of the phrase Lions led by donkeys where it comes to this strike. The unions are selling teachers down the river - striking just to try get one over on the Tories. Forgive the language but the union leaders are CUNTS, utter cunts. They know the situation with the country but dont give a shit.

TalkinPeace2 · 23/06/2011 23:22

Twinkly -
do you have a link to that calculator because 65% cuts in pensions were NOT part of the Hutton Review on which the Government's position is very tightly based
(I had to read it with my LGPS employer hat on !)