To think this article on pubic hair topiary is depressing

[VivaLeBeaver]

Can't believe a woman wrote it. I thought that the Health Guidance website that its on is a serious health website, I think Heat magazine would be ashamed to write such drivel.

topiary

I find my foof much more attractive shaved than not I don't watch that much porn so how does that work then timewasting?

What the fuck's sexy about it?

well you can see it for one thing...

No I get it. It's sexy like any other fetish I suppose. Tight corsets, ridiculous high heels, bondage. Mmm... sexy.

baby soft skin, lots of baby oil, you can see everything so its visually stimulating

try it, you'll have the best shag of your life

i dont find it sexy at all.

not a fetish. just good house keeping. do you not get...well hairs in your mouths if you are au naturel?

but I bet your DP would, lissielou...

Wow, I didn't even mention pre-pubescent yet and TheFlyingOnion beats me to it.

What's 'sexy' about 'baby-soft' skin?

I don't get this porn comparison.

So do all your 'natural' women sit around watching 70's porn all day then?

I'm afraid I have daughters and so being hairless seems a bit pervy to me and if my DH were bare, OMG I don't think I could have sex until it grew back, I also have sons.

The porn thing is interesting though, but apparently hair/hairless goes in cycles and right now the fashion is to be bare. I can't help thinking that it's more to do with youth than porn, but porn must be influencing the fashion somehow.

no he wouldnt, ive tried it once and it was... "meh" sexiness isnt about your hair coverage.

worra, I don't watch porn at all.

You are right timewasting..nothing is sexier than the feel of rough, calloused skin ????

do you think because loo roll is sold as "kitten soft" people harbour secret desire to wipe thier arses on baby cats?

what do you mean, you don't get it? You don't get the comparisons between the porn industry and the increase in women having vaginoplasty either then?

There have been some good articles recently discussing these issues in various newspapers. Susie Orbach springs to mind as one of them, who is a pyschotherapist and feminist academic who writes alot about women/body image

Toilet paper is sexy???

ok TimeWasting, are your feet covered in hobbit-like thick, hard calluses and yeasty infections?

Or are they moisturised and filed and baby soft?

I know which I'd rather have and its got fuck all to do with paedophilia

actually, in a bloke I do think that rough skin is sexy... sort of manly

no but it is soft...which is nicer against your bum no?

lissie I'm specifically meaning on a woman here...

we moisturise to get "baby soft" skin - its a saying ffs

TimeWaster seems to think if a man likes a brazilian he's channelling his inner paedo...

TFO, its possible to be somewhere between. I dont wear make up either, I dont see the point. dh didnt fall in love with a barbie doll, but a real woman who burps and farts and gets morning breath. no point pretending otherwise imho

dont moisturise my body either.

My feet aren't baby soft. Feet have thick, leathery skin on the soles to protect them. 'Tenderfoot' is a term of reference for the inexperienced and young, so, sorry, same thing applies. Infantilisation.

I'm with catgirl. I choose to keep my situation...minimal as it makes everything feel so much more sensitive and better during sex. I also prefer how it looks as compared to an afro-bush.

Yes DP also prefers it but that's not my main reason for doing it.

Hairs in partner's mouth and lack of sensation due to big bush is not sexy to me. Also wearing sexy knickers is a waste of time imo if you've got big spider legs sprouting out the sides.

Oh and neither DP or I watch porn on a regular basis so I think your conclusion is bullshit TimeWasting