sorry, I would just like to come back on something I said yesterday - I have been in and out f this thread, as have been a bit off colour in RL.
wrt the whooping cough vaccine info I posted. The stat I meant to post was that the same proportion of immunised and unimmunised children contracted whooping cough - which is vastly different from "half the cases were in immunised children"
at "well, it worked ofr me and others" being taken as proof positive that the vaccine is effective, btw (even though, since you actually contracted whooping cough, it didn't really work al that well, did it?) - how about the same courtesy being extended to people who say that a vaccine is ineffective, or worse, dangerous, due to the reaction that they have seen in their child and in others around them? no, thought not.
also pmsl at bigfatcath's "I have worked in SEN for 12 years" suddenly making her the authority on vaccine damaged children. that's about as good as "my best friend is gay, no honestly, he is..." why on earth does working in a school for 12 years sudenly lend more weight to why there is (or isn't) a rise in ASD figures, than maybe someone who has been heavily involved in the research end of the ASD community?
Murphy: various different vaccines and diseases have been discussed on this thread - not sure you can call the shots as to what people want to discuss.
bubbley is right - you can see the difference in how chicken pox is viewed between here and the USA as part of how having a vaccination for a disease changes the perception of that disease. it is no fun having chicken pox in America (dd1 did). no fun at all - we were practically put into an isolation unit - this despite the doctor we saw knowing virtually nothing about chicken pox anyway...
oh, and someone else mentioned upthread about how if, you go to the doctor with an immunised child who is presenting with sympotms of measles - no tests are doen, etc, cannot possibly be measles as have had the jab (
) and all you end up with is being sent away with a "oh, it must be a measles like virus" - this is true, and therefore totally skews any figures that anyone wants to give on: effectiveness of vaccine, length of immunity, numbers of cases etc.
if the DOH was serious about anyhtign at all to do with measles - the first thign they coudl do woudl be to actually investigate how many cases there are int he first place.