InmaculadaConcepcion- I know thats the way it has to work but I wouldn't expect the people subsidising everyone else to be happy about it.
actually ikoto she's not subsidising everyone else.
Everyone born in the UK receives an "investment" from the Government in the form of: schooling, medical bills, subsidised transport, child support payments, and the generally stable civil society protected and enforced by the police and armed services. These all cost money and we payback the government "investment" through our tax. Now, if this was all Adele had received, she would be paying over the odds.
However, unlike myself (and I assume yourself), Adele is a multi-platinum selling musician, which means she has benefited from services paid for by the taxpayer which you and I don't. Namely:
- government investment in broadcasting infrastructure. This has allowed her music to be heard on radio and television (generating a huge income from royalties) and thus bought by the public.
- free trade and intellectual copyright agreements. These, negotiated and maintained by civil servants and legal experts paid for by the taxpayer, allow her to freely export her music overseas and collect royalty payments due, while protecting her from copyright infringements.
In paying for these services through her tax bill she's simply paying back the government for services rendered....
I agree, she's young, she probably hasn't given this issues a lot of thought, so you know, fair enough being shocked by the bill (although, really, did she think musicians didn't pay tax?) But this quote:
"When I got my tax bill in, I was ready to go and buy a gun and randomly open fire."
is a bit much....