Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To want smoking banned in public playgrounds

219 replies

onadietcokebreak · 28/04/2011 19:04

why should I remove my child because a smoker ( two in my case today) thinks it's okay to smoke in a small enclosed playground.

Can't they wait til their children have finished? Bloody selfish in my opinion ( as a ex smoker)

OP posts:
LDNmummy · 29/04/2011 16:43

"LDNmummy, I'm not going to explain why being near a smoker can't be worse than being the smoker. You just carry right on saying it."

I didn't just carry right on saying it, I substantiated with scietific research however.

"However... wet dog shit smell is not going to harm my health. Toxocariasis is picked up from dog shit (often by children) and can make them go blind."

Is this solely from the smell alone?

"The emissions from car exhausts are responsible for more deaths than road accidents, according to World Health Organisation (WHO) research. That was the first google hit from a car fumes search and is a bit old, but for balance includes a GP saying "yeah, but smoking kills too"

Then the fact that smoking is even more toxic and harmful is even further highlighted.

"That's not to say that you can't be concerned about two or even three dangers. Just that if someone is going to be join a mob of smoker-haters they probably want to be sure they are not guilty of worse (or guilty of ignoring worse) or it might make them seem hypocritical."

If smokers want to defend their right to smoke, they should be equally as informed of the dangers it poses to others and not just themselves. And, try to act accordingly.

LDNmummy · 29/04/2011 16:53

Fair enough:

"Absolute complete horseshit.

Regards so called "third hand smoke" there is a single study (referenced in the SciAm link) that that author himself admits has conclusions that aren't supported and are little more than speculation.

There is zero credible evidence that "third hand smoke" presents any kind of credible risk to anyone.

I say this as a non smoker."

I seem to recall the tobacco companies saying similar about the effects of smoking and second hand smoke.

I did state it was new research and it is a fact that 'third hand smoke' contains toxins according to that research which is VERY new and still going on (as I stated and never denied). It is the first research of its kind.

This does not negate the points I made about second hand smoke which are proven.

There ARE toxins in third hand smoke according to this research. It is just not extensive enough yet to see its full effects and that is why I never denied it was NEW research.

LDNmummy · 29/04/2011 16:55

Oh and that research is not only cited in the one article but has been picked up on by all the reputable mainstream organizations and media bodies.

LookToWindward · 29/04/2011 16:59

"There ARE toxins in third hand smoke according to this research."

Indeed they are, however as the author of the report himself indicates statistically they aren't significant enough to be able to distinguish from other toxins that occur in the environment.

There is zero evidence that there is any risk from so called "third hand smoke" and even suggest otherwise is hysterically at best, outright scaremongering at worst.

And I'd hardly call "cancer.org" a credible source.

LDNmummy · 29/04/2011 17:08

Yeah I do see your points, I'm not the kind of person to go on and on if I am proved wrong so fair enough, I accept that. I do think third hand smoke will eventually come to light but as I said, the research is incredibly new.

But it still does not negate the points about second hand smoke and the extent of the harm it causes which is recognised pretty much worldwide. The fact that it is more harmful than car fumes for instance should highlight how harmful it is to tohers and people should act with due consideration when smoking in areas where other people and children are present.

ragged · 29/04/2011 17:54

Snigger @ BitofFunPP.

catchmeifyoucan · 29/04/2011 18:27

Jeeze LDN but you are going on and on and on and on and on and on. Honestly - you're close to making my piss boil with your ranting ffs.

wotnochocs · 29/04/2011 18:29

YANBU It really isn't necessary.
Not just for
children's sake , I hate the smellof it too.

TandB · 29/04/2011 18:31

LDNmummy Fri 29-Apr-11 16:21:48
But Kungfu that is ONCE a year, and personally I wouldn't crowd my kids around a bonfire. I was in primary school with a boy who accidentally got set alight on bonfire night and was scarred head to toe (very sad).

Um, I didn't make the comment about the bonfire - I was responding to someone else. That is why it was quoted.

Admiralpiett · 29/04/2011 18:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LDNmummy · 30/04/2011 02:25

Sorry Kungfu, misunderstanding.

Catchme people questioned what I was saying and I responded. Unfortunately, in large and fractured pieces which I acknowledged and apologised for without prompting. Is this not a discussion forum and has no one ever gone on and on to prove a point before? Isnt that the whole point, to have a point and back it up? It may be making your piss boil but I was proving my point after people were arguing with me about it. I didn't realise responses were now considered ranting Hmm

If you have a point to make by all means...

But otherwise, what is your issue exactly?

LDNmummy · 30/04/2011 02:29

How many times did I say point there Grin

Lovemy2babies · 30/04/2011 07:39

YANBU - I hate the smell of cigarettes.

Catchmeifyoucan - You have been rather agressivly defensive in this thread. Is there a reason why you are so defensive over smoking in public or near children? Genuine question.

HeadfirstForHalos · 30/04/2011 08:25

YANBU. Car fumes are bad too, I agree, but a smoker can choose to step out of the playgroung for a quick fag, it's unpleasant, unnecessary and anti-social to spark up next to another family and proceed to blow smoke at them.

Yes as the non-smoker you can move, but why the hell should you have to?

Admiralpiett · 30/04/2011 09:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

trixymalixy · 01/05/2011 18:24

I'm failing to see what exactly the "car fumes are worse" argument has to do with smoking near children. Are you saying that it's alright to smoke near children because they are already exposed to car fumes on a regular basis?

It's equivalent to arguing that because kids are exposed to radiation from the sun on a regular basis then it's alright for them to be exposed to a tiny bit of toxic waste from a nuclear reactor. In other words quite possibly the most stupid argument I have ever heard.

smoking near children under any circumstances is just completely unacceptable and selfish.

onadietcokebreak · 01/05/2011 20:06

Exactly trixy!

OP posts:
usualsuspect · 01/05/2011 20:13

smog

do you drive?

lubberlich · 01/05/2011 21:39

Christ - even when I was a dedicated 30 a day smoker I wasn't such a twot to smoke in playgrounds.
Ban it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread