When I was in Morrocco many of the women from our tour grouip wore clothing that one would not necessarily think appropriate for casablance- cropped tops etc (not me). Nothing nad happened, although ahd they tried to enter te Mosque compound they'd have been refused- a shame as it was so incredibly stunning a place.
What I don;t het about all this is how women are helped by a alrgely patriarchal government inflicting a ban on something that migt liberate some women from a choice they did not make but simultaneously forces a choice on others who were quaite able to make thier own minds up before?
Isn't it just shifting the burden of oppression, rather than alleviating it?
Oh and the swastika comment above? When at uni we had some speakers in from Hindu groups about reclaiming the swastika, which is and was an ancient Hindu emblem. I did link on here to some articles years ago but have since lost them. Swastikas in conjunction with Nazi sympathisers or the politics of hate / right wing extremism- offensive. Not always though, at least if people understand the true origins and meanings (which i do get they often do not).
And I don't think the idea of French secularism really works unless ALL religious clothing is banned: karas, crosses, bindi....... I woudln't persoanlly vote for that but it would seem fairer.
Should point out I am a Christian Quaker not a Muslim, before I get accused of anything like anti Christian bias (well it is MN...)