Feckless men...

[BarmyArmy]

Shakes head in disbelief

I will never understand why women are remotely attracted to losers like this guy. Unattractive, no job, ridiculous chav necklace??? I can't imagine the children are going to be of much use to society in the future given their start in life. I may be generalising but how many doctors or barristers are born into environments like this?

Hammy, that was uncalled for. The children didn't chose to be born.
The individual in question should be sterilised, these girls (and most of them were/are under the age of consent) are to be pitied. He is a chancer and should have a self renewing condom attatched to his cock, apart from the pregnancy there is the STD's to consider. What a twerp he is.

This is probably a deeply stupid question but isn't there any implant for men?

A nurse I know was telling me about a scheme for getting implants into teenage girls at the age of about 14 I think, they last something like 5 years don't they. Not sure whether that's something that actually happens, or just her plan for what should happen. I don't know much about the implant (see above) but is there an argument for doing this? Not many girls or their families want to be dealing with pregnancies before the age of 19 do they?

But then would boys use this as just another way to pressurise girls into sex?

Hammy - you've summed up why I hate the word chav.

DW continually despairs at how the intelligent, nice girls with good prospects that she teaches end up "going out with" complete dead-end losers. It's almost as if they want someone who will treat them like shit.

that isn't a man in my book

scumbag yes!

Horrid article designed to bring out the BNP supporter within.

The Daily Mail disgusts me more than anything else tbh.

But the crux of the matter is not whether this guy is a heel or the girls slappers - or even the welfare of the offspring - BUT the COST - the HUGE COST of supporting all these girls and this bloke.

In times past many a girl was swept off her feet by a charmer and fell pregnant. But the man was obliged to marry her and set up a home.

Now a bloke can shag to his heart's content and knows he has no obligation - financial or moral - whatsoever. And the girls know that there's no censure and that they'll be taken care of.

That isn't completely true as the CSA can set up a deduction of earnings order to get money from the man.

Electra ? horrid article, why? Why is it bad to read about such things?

electra, there is no point in the csa doing so, it's unlikely he works or would earn enough to contribute sufficiently.

I read this in the Telegraph and it made me sad. Sad at the low expectations young people have for their lives. The astronomical cost to the state is another problem. The cycle of deprivation the children are being born into, the poverty of aspiration. No one wins.

Daily Mail or not, something needs to change.

Low expectations and a lack of ambition amongst young people today do indeed make depressing but, provided their problems werenot paid for by the State, I wouldn't really mind so much.

It is the State taking on responsibility for the financial upkeep of these children that has allowed this twunt to walk away so many times.

No support for single mums = more shotgun weddings/more Dads and brothers visiting such ar$e-holes late at night for a "little chat" = a decline in the number of unwanted babies, eventually.

Worth a go or discussion at least - our present system clearly isn't working!

The State has taken place of natural selection. If no-one intervened to pay for these children, they wouldn't survive. I'm not saying I want the streets littered with children but something has to be done to stop the taxpayer picking up the bill for the offspring of workless, feral fertilisers.

i only feel sorry for those poor children having their lives broadcast about the nation simply for having feckless parents.

Hammy02 - quite so. Keith Joseph had the right idea.

Oh FFS! Far more of your hard-earned taxes are going on keeping the Royal parasites in palaces and propping up greedy bankers and corporations.
BarmyArmy: Are you a windup merchant or just stupid?

I think Melika makes a valid point. i know things change but surely it is better to have both parents around if possible and this guy does not sound a very good bet to be your child's father.

I think the man is an idiot and all those women are as bad who knowingly had a child when they knew he had that many children he couldnt care for.

barmy is always on the wind up. take no heed SGB

SGB - Royals pay tax and bring in revenues (via tourism and 'championing' Britain overseas).

I didn't agree with the bail-out of the banks - should have let them go to the wall, in my view.

SGB - do you label anyone that disagrees with you as stupid?

Ah but let's not forget, it was the plan of NuLaboor to have huge swathes of the proles suckling on the teat of nanny state, keeps them voting labour, all part of the plan.

Only not now.

Yes sperminaters like this guy should have a forced vasectomy, they do nothing for the country but cost the taxpayers money. I would rather fund the Royal Family who do bring in money to this country than this parasite.

BarmyArmy: can you provide any links that demonstrate that the Royals actually bring in more money than they cost?

Ach... SGB- never wrestle with a pig- you get dirty, and the pig likes it.