Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think that if the comments reagrding the Pope and Catholicism in general were being made about any other religion or group of people...

200 replies

domesticsluttery · 19/09/2010 19:49

...it would be deemed entirely unacceptable?

I don't just mean on MN, it seems to be everywhere. I am not a Catholic, but I am really Shock at a lot of what I have heard.

OK, the abuse scandals are completely shocking. But this doesn't mean that the entire Catholic Church and all of its members were involved. There have been plenty of scandals involving the abuse of children in care homes where it has been covered up by so called professionals, but this doesn't mean that anyone involved in social services is implicated. There are plenty of cases of abuse, doemstic violence etc carried out by teachers, police etc and covered up, this doesn't disgrace the whole profession.

It must be pretty hard going to be a Catholic at the moment. I can't help feeling that if the same kind of comments and outright mocking were being made about other religions there would be an outcry.

Whatever happened to live and let live?

OP posts:
TheFallenMadonna · 19/09/2010 21:01

Yes!! That's what I genuinely don't understand. I was taught that if you confessed to a dreadful crime and sought repentence, but without making bringing yourself to the authorities to be dealt with under the law, then your repentance was unlikely to be genuine. But that seems to be true of the laity but not the clergy perhaps.

Habbibu · 19/09/2010 21:01

So what about robust criticism and anger, dom? Is that ok?

spikeycow · 19/09/2010 21:02

Short and sweet eh.

rainrainrainsun · 19/09/2010 21:04

faaamily great name! Totally agree with you.

Inertia · 19/09/2010 21:04

There's a very big difference between mockery and justified protest. There's also a big difference between persecuting individuals for their religious beliefs, and picking holes in ridiculous statements that people make on behalf of their religion.

You're right to say that other groups have been involved in cases of child abuse, and there can be no excuses for such horrific crimes. But care home managers (to use your example) are not setting themselves up as the moral compass for millions of people across the world, dictating how they should live their lives. Care home managers are not causing untold deaths from STDs by banning condom use, they are not demanding taxpayer funding for state visits to countries cutting all kinds of provision for its citizens, they are not proclaiming the acceptability of homophobia and sexism, they are not creaming off pots of money to set up their own wealthy state.

The Pope, and Catholicism in general, has a lot to say about how people should live their lives, while apparently believing that the same moral guidelines and criminal laws do not apply to them. If you're going to set yourself up as the moral standard everyone should aim for, you'd best make damn sure your own house is in order.

bruxeur · 19/09/2010 21:06

Fuck debate.

I want to see a deathmatch, Pope vs hungry bear. But the Pope's got his mitre and some nunchucks, and the bear's hungover.

Let's see how papal infallibility deals with that one.

Animation · 19/09/2010 21:06

Good call Inertia.

TheHeathenOfSuburbia · 19/09/2010 21:09

Thing is, I don't think there's actually another religion on the planet that has such a rigid hierarchy as the Catholic Church, is there? Especially with the pope's status as God's representative on earth. Think you'd have to go down to some quite small cults to find a similar figurehead, no?

So maybe criticism of the church's leadership is felt more strongly by the rank and file members?

For example, if I posted on here saying the cleric Abu Hamza was wrong to incite murder, I wouldn't expect any muslims to take it as an attack on them personally (or, indeed, to disagree...)

But if I say a cardinal was wrong to cover up child-abusing priests and just move them around, it all kicks off and we get 'you wouldn't say that about islam', and 'that's all over now'. Which I will believe when I see priests doing time. Instead of sincerely repenting and being forgiven. And then doing it again.

rainrainrainsun · 19/09/2010 21:13

I think one of the main problems is the "belief"that those who are religeous-whatever form that may take "are automatically right".Whilst Atheists "are wrong".
I have no issue at all with what others may believe in or worship.
I think the Catholic church are promoting beliefs that are are morally wrong and unlawful.

edam · 19/09/2010 21:19

Neither are care home managers hiding and protecting child abusers. Or attempting to prevent police investigations into paedophiles working in childrens' homes. (Apart from Lord Laming and Margaret Hodge, that is.)

chipmonkey · 19/09/2010 21:55

Ex-Catholic here too.

I gave up being a catholic because I could no longer believe everything I had been told, that sex outside marriage was wrong, homosexuality was wrong, contraception was wrong etc. I also don't like the misogynistic practice of excluding women from the hierarchy.

I deplore the Church's handling of the sex abuse cases and the general mistreatment of so many children and young mothers who were unfortunate enough to find themselves being cared for by church institutions.

But your average Catholic who goes to mass every Sunday is usually a decent person. And most of them are also decent enough to know their own minds on the major issues. I live in Ireland and contrary to popular belief, I am sure that ALL my catholic friends have used artificial contraception, I don't know ANY that are vehemently homophobic apart from my MIL and the vast majority cohabited before marrying.

They go to Mass largely because they believe in the message of Jesus and I have to say, Jesus was one of the milder guys in religious history and did preach a good and loving message. Why should these people dissociate themselves from a religion they believe in because some of their leaders have turned out to be corrupt. Bit like deciding not to be British any more because of the way Tony Blair behaved in Irag.

And I have noticed a trend on MN where it is OK to bash Catholics for being Catholic in a way in which it is NOT okay to bash other religions and if you did you would be come down upon like a ton of bricks.

It is very rare to find a major religion which actively allows women to be leaders. It is also rare to find a major religion which tolerated homosexuality and abortion. But MNers single out catholicism to bash for these reasons, oddly enough never mentioning the stance of other religions.

I find it hypocritical and disappointing.

bruxeur · 19/09/2010 21:57

Appropriately enough, really.

We are talking about catholicism after all.

echt · 19/09/2010 22:01

The bottom line about religious groups for me is, how do they treat women?

Like shit second-class ctitzens, I think you'll find.

Possible let-out here for Quakers; don't know enough about them.

Faaamily · 19/09/2010 22:07

I don't single out Catholicism. Islam, Judaism and Hinduism can 'ave it, too.

rainrainrainsun · 19/09/2010 22:15

er chipmonkey maybe thats because saying one thing and doing another is hypocrisy

bumpsoon · 19/09/2010 22:18

saw a brilliant placard online at the birmingham do today ' absitinence makes the church grow fondlers' Grin there were many others ,but that one just took the Biscuit

bumpsoon · 19/09/2010 22:19

bugger that should read abstinence of course

Inertia · 19/09/2010 22:32

Chipmonkey, I haven't been on MN long enough to know whether there genuinely is a concerted effort to show disrespect to Catholicism. However, it's clearly a topical subject this week because of the Pope's visit to the UK. The number of posts relating to Catholicism is bound to increase when it's a major news topic. It's probably a fair bet that, the more influential/ widely recognised a religion (or any organisation) is, the more people there are that will have views on it. I expect you'd find more internet posts slagging off Chelsea FC than Rochdale FC. Also, the Pope has made some very specific comments directed at UK citizens and non-Catholics, and people will react to these- no other religious leader has had similar comments published recently.

I'd also argue that subjects close to your own heart are also much more noticeable- because of your religious background, these threads will stand out to you in a way that others don't.

jenny60 · 19/09/2010 22:49

chipmonkey: Maybe the question to ask is, why are my friends still in a church when they use contraception, don't think homosexuality is evil or maybe even don't think masturbation is a sin? There are plenty of places to pray and hear and learn about Jesus if that's what the want. Why go to a church which professes a lot of ideas they don't agree with and which has, especially in Ireland, been shown to be involved in a systemtic cover up of child rapists. I know all about family and tradition as I was brought up Catholic, but when I realised that I actively opposed what the church stood for I left. Why be part of an institution that despises most of what you believe to be right? I don't blame individual Catholics for the child abuse, I blame the people who did it and those who covered it up. But I do think that every catholic has to ask themselves how they feel about belonging to and thus supporting an institution which holds these views.

chipmonkey · 19/09/2010 23:14

I've noticed it long before the Pope came to Britain. It's always been something that irked me, not in a major way, because no longer being catholic myself means that I don't have a burning desire to defend it either.

I don't think my friends are hypocritical. I think they are hoping that there will come a time when the church reforms. I know a lot were disappointed when Ratzinger became pope as they were hoping for a more liberal leader. When Pope John Paul the first was elected, there were whisperings that he would relax the rules about contraception and make the church more of a peoples church but his untimely death meant this didn't happen.

I have also noticed that there is much hand-wringing about the fact that we can't have terminations of pregnancy in the Republic of Ireland. No one ever, ever points out that women in Northern Ireland also cannot procure a termination and have to travel to Great Britain to get one at their own personal expense. And Northern Ireland is part of Britain! And the majority of people in NI are not Catholic, so who is preventing the terminations there? Presbyterian-bashing is not popular, it seems.

chipmonkey · 20/09/2010 00:13

And Jenny ( sounds like you and I left the church for the same reasons!) I think the other reason people don't want to leave it that there are a lot of traditions within catholicism that some catholics find comforting. Off the top of my head, I know a lot of women, even my age, are very devoted to Mary, and you don't find that in any other church that I can think of. I also think the tradition of confession is something a lot of people find comforting and get a sense of being unburdened. Also the other stuff, lighting candles for special intentions, the smell of incense, I really think the catholic church is unique in many ways and not all that easy to replace with another church. Now, none of this ever did anything for me, I have to say but I know people do take comfort from these little things.

And yes, I do wonder, when I see people I know to be intelligent, persisting in belonging to an organisation that I would have thought ought to be anathema to them, whether they have really thought it through? But religion is such a personal thing, that I don't think anyone is qualified to judge another person for it.

jenny60 · 20/09/2010 09:50

jesus molly Sad Where's the justice? This goes on and, as I said on another thread, we have yet to hear about what went on in Africa, Asia and Latin America where some of these child rapists were sent by the Vatican. And then there's the whole issue of all the other abuse, the beatings, the psychological torture, the non-sexual cruelty that has ruined people lives.

Chipmonkey: sorry, I think your friends (and some of mine too) are just wrong and selfish if they think that their right to this:

'I also think the tradition of confession is something a lot of people find comforting and get a sense of being unburdened. Also the other stuff, lighting candles for special intentions, the smell of incense, I really think the catholic church is unique in many ways and not all that easy to replace with another church.'

is more important than standing up to these people. FFS the smell of incense is NOT important, not as important as sending a message to these people. And as for confession: go to a friend or a counsellor if you need to be unburdened. I went to confession as a child. I remember being told I must have sinned and sitting outside the confessional and desperately trying to make myself, at the age of 10, or 12 or whatever, think of the bad things I had done. That is not a good tradition. It is damaging. But more important, seeking confession through a representative of a church which has done these things and which tells gay people they are evil! How could they? The man who heard my confession when I was at school was later found out to be a child rapist. The nun who told me I must have sinned used to hit us children at school. The priests who hear confession now may not be, but they still represent an institution full of defenders of unspeakable crimes. The church has not become liberal since Vatican II, it's gone the other way, so hanging on for a 'liberal pope' is crazy and the worst kind of justification. Where's the precedent? When has the church been liberalised? Vatican II was unique. What evidence is there of this impending liberalism? There's none, face it. It seems in fact that the current pope has decided that he will uphold all the most conservative values even though it means the church will shrink. He would rather have a smaller church than one which rejects the core values which most decent people do not agree with. He's offering your friends nothing.

On another issue, the fact that Northern Irish women have to go to the 'mainland' for an abortion is wrong, but this doesn't make the situation in the Republic any less wrong. Abortion is illegal in NI because of a combined effort of the Presbyterians and the Catholics. They don't come together on many issues, certainly not on integrated schools, but they will for this. Of course it's very wrong but we are now talking about the pope and the Catholic church. This is why no one is talking about the Presbyterians, or Muslims, or Jews or whatever right now obviously. But try a thread on the abortion in NI issue and see if you don't get people being just as critical of the Presbyterians there.

I have friends like yours. One tells me proudly that his parish priest is gay and everyone knows it and is fine with it in the parish. This man was divorced and has remarried a devout catholic. Their lovely church wouldn't marry them, doesn't recognise their children and condemns homosexuality, but off they go to church every week. The loyalty of people like this is to a church that doesn't exist: the only way they can stay in is to pretend that it's something else, wants to be something else, will be something else. But it won't. It is what it is: at least the pope has never pretended otherwise.

Aitch · 20/09/2010 10:38

god, molly, i am in bits watching that. how brave of him, how amazing.

Habbibu · 20/09/2010 11:10

bloody hell, molly. bloody hell.